<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft patch that didn&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6787/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6787</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6787/comment-page-1#comment-23392</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 03:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23392</guid>
		<description>Admit defeat? did they loose? what stuff are you smoking? ;-) Where did you read that OSX is more populair then XP?

Apple OS X is really not better. From a technical point of view they should not license a stone age unix based linux-like core but a more hyper modern OS like BEOS. At least XP is based on pure MS code. Build in only +- 15 years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admit defeat? did they loose? what stuff are you smoking? <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Where did you read that OSX is more populair then XP?</p>
<p>Apple OS X is really not better. From a technical point of view they should not license a stone age unix based linux-like core but a more hyper modern OS like BEOS. At least XP is based on pure MS code. Build in only +- 15 years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6787/comment-page-1#comment-23176</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23176</guid>
		<description>Billy n da boyz should take a leaf out of apples book, admit defeat, and base their next OS on a linux distro. At least they&#039;d be starting with more stable foundations than the current versions of windows. 

I&#039;d recommend they use wine and winex as well. With ms&#039;s resources devoted to it, backwards compatibility for games wouldn&#039;t be an issue. Well, no more than it is at the moment. Just try running most 95 based games on a modern pc. Heck i&#039;ve seen games refuse to install because i&#039;ve had too much space free on the drive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billy n da boyz should take a leaf out of apples book, admit defeat, and base their next OS on a linux distro. At least they&#8217;d be starting with more stable foundations than the current versions of windows. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d recommend they use wine and winex as well. With ms&#8217;s resources devoted to it, backwards compatibility for games wouldn&#8217;t be an issue. Well, no more than it is at the moment. Just try running most 95 based games on a modern pc. Heck i&#8217;ve seen games refuse to install because i&#8217;ve had too much space free on the drive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


