<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft patch that didn&#8217;t</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6787</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 07:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6787#comment-23392</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 03:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6787#comment-23392</guid>
		<description>Admit defeat? did they loose? what stuff are you smoking? ;-) Where did you read that OSX is more populair then XP?

Apple OS X is really not better. From a technical point of view they should not license a stone age unix based linux-like core but a more hyper modern OS like BEOS. At least XP is based on pure MS code. Build in only +- 15 years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admit defeat? did they loose? what stuff are you smoking? <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> Where did you read that OSX is more populair then XP?</p>
<p>Apple OS X is really not better. From a technical point of view they should not license a stone age unix based linux-like core but a more hyper modern OS like BEOS. At least XP is based on pure MS code. Build in only +- 15 years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6787#comment-23176</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6787#comment-23176</guid>
		<description>Billy n da boyz should take a leaf out of apples book, admit defeat, and base their next OS on a linux distro. At least they'd be starting with more stable foundations than the current versions of windows. 

I'd recommend they use wine and winex as well. With ms's resources devoted to it, backwards compatibility for games wouldn't be an issue. Well, no more than it is at the moment. Just try running most 95 based games on a modern pc. Heck i've seen games refuse to install because i've had too much space free on the drive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billy n da boyz should take a leaf out of apples book, admit defeat, and base their next OS on a linux distro. At least they&#8217;d be starting with more stable foundations than the current versions of windows. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d recommend they use wine and winex as well. With ms&#8217;s resources devoted to it, backwards compatibility for games wouldn&#8217;t be an issue. Well, no more than it is at the moment. Just try running most 95 based games on a modern pc. Heck i&#8217;ve seen games refuse to install because i&#8217;ve had too much space free on the drive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
