<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: P2p data sharing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6797/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6797</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6797/comment-page-1#comment-23181</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23181</guid>
		<description>Maybe a miracle will happen and these pollies will take a look at some real blogs and actually get an idea of what real ppl out there think!!!

Nah.. I&#039;m sure it&#039;d never be allowed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe a miracle will happen and these pollies will take a look at some real blogs and actually get an idea of what real ppl out there think!!!</p>
<p>Nah.. I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;d never be allowed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6797/comment-page-1#comment-23171</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23171</guid>
		<description>&quot;Well, sex, disaster and drama sell. We all know that&#039;s what mainstream media is all about, including most newspapers and magazines - at least the most consumed ones.&quot;

Actually many people I talk to, especially older people, would love to have more positive news.  All the doom-and-gloom is really depressing.  A nice balance of &quot;world events&quot; and &quot;what you can do to make it better / the good things in life&quot; would be the best combination.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Well, sex, disaster and drama sell. We all know that&#8217;s what mainstream media is all about, including most newspapers and magazines &#8211; at least the most consumed ones.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually many people I talk to, especially older people, would love to have more positive news.  All the doom-and-gloom is really depressing.  A nice balance of &#8220;world events&#8221; and &#8220;what you can do to make it better / the good things in life&#8221; would be the best combination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6797/comment-page-1#comment-23169</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 08:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23169</guid>
		<description>&quot;If it isn&#039;t being bad to your fellow man or if it isn&#039;t plastered with sex, then it isn&#039;t considered news worthy.&quot;

Well, sex, disaster and drama sell. We all know that&#039;s what mainstream media is all about, including most newspapers and magazines - at least the most consumed ones. See, it&#039;s not about telling the truth anymore, it&#039;s about how you present the news. If it&#039;s shocking, it will sell. Media corporations are so bloated and crushed by their own billions of fictive dollars that their only options are : TO SELL or TO DIE.

They have become greedy and therefore no longer serve any interests than their own - their newspapers have become their own propaganda.

If it was all about reporting news, they would die, because the taller the giant is, the harder is the fall.

You can Google your news for free from tons of international journalists, recognized by mainstream opinion or not. Form your own judgment upon it, because anyway, unless you&#039;re &#039;there&#039; you can never really know what happened, and even then, you would need all the contextual information behind events to be able to really understand them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If it isn&#8217;t being bad to your fellow man or if it isn&#8217;t plastered with sex, then it isn&#8217;t considered news worthy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, sex, disaster and drama sell. We all know that&#8217;s what mainstream media is all about, including most newspapers and magazines &#8211; at least the most consumed ones. See, it&#8217;s not about telling the truth anymore, it&#8217;s about how you present the news. If it&#8217;s shocking, it will sell. Media corporations are so bloated and crushed by their own billions of fictive dollars that their only options are : TO SELL or TO DIE.</p>
<p>They have become greedy and therefore no longer serve any interests than their own &#8211; their newspapers have become their own propaganda.</p>
<p>If it was all about reporting news, they would die, because the taller the giant is, the harder is the fall.</p>
<p>You can Google your news for free from tons of international journalists, recognized by mainstream opinion or not. Form your own judgment upon it, because anyway, unless you&#8217;re &#8216;there&#8217; you can never really know what happened, and even then, you would need all the contextual information behind events to be able to really understand them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6797/comment-page-1#comment-23161</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23161</guid>
		<description>I apologize to the readers for getting off the subject and on to a rant about the evils and persuasiveness of advertising. It just seems that it goes hand in hand with lamescream. I guess it is part of what I and evidently many others think is wrong with it besides the unadmitted bias that is practiced but not owned up to. 

Lamescream is losing this battle for listener and readership. They know it too. There is no other reason for them to attempt invasion into the Internet from their main interest in whatever they do, other than that realization. 

Many have already had their 15 minutes of fame. Those 15 minutes didn&#039;t really represent the facts nor did they present an unpartizan viewpoint. For myself I understand this reluctance to talk to the media, especially with something sensitive. 

I have long ago dropped out of lamescreams&#039; radar. I no longer get my news from anywhere but the Internet. I totally dislike the mayhem and evils of society that lamescream seems to think sells. There is a world of good people out there. To hear lamescream day after day would have you think the world is full of perverts and criminals and their are your neighbors. Ever notice how strangers look at each other in the big city? Isn&#039;t the same for the small towns. To me lamescream has a large portion of the blame in this reaction to strangers as they tend to capitalize on this basic human reaction and sensationalize bad news.

Life isn&#039;t all bad news or is it all tradegies. Somehow, predominately that is what hits the news though. If it isn&#039;t being bad to your fellow man or if it isn&#039;t plastered with sex, then it isn&#039;t considered news worthy. I know that life doesn&#039;t consist of evil in those proportions as is represented in lamescream. You should know it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize to the readers for getting off the subject and on to a rant about the evils and persuasiveness of advertising. It just seems that it goes hand in hand with lamescream. I guess it is part of what I and evidently many others think is wrong with it besides the unadmitted bias that is practiced but not owned up to. </p>
<p>Lamescream is losing this battle for listener and readership. They know it too. There is no other reason for them to attempt invasion into the Internet from their main interest in whatever they do, other than that realization. </p>
<p>Many have already had their 15 minutes of fame. Those 15 minutes didn&#8217;t really represent the facts nor did they present an unpartizan viewpoint. For myself I understand this reluctance to talk to the media, especially with something sensitive. </p>
<p>I have long ago dropped out of lamescreams&#8217; radar. I no longer get my news from anywhere but the Internet. I totally dislike the mayhem and evils of society that lamescream seems to think sells. There is a world of good people out there. To hear lamescream day after day would have you think the world is full of perverts and criminals and their are your neighbors. Ever notice how strangers look at each other in the big city? Isn&#8217;t the same for the small towns. To me lamescream has a large portion of the blame in this reaction to strangers as they tend to capitalize on this basic human reaction and sensationalize bad news.</p>
<p>Life isn&#8217;t all bad news or is it all tradegies. Somehow, predominately that is what hits the news though. If it isn&#8217;t being bad to your fellow man or if it isn&#8217;t plastered with sex, then it isn&#8217;t considered news worthy. I know that life doesn&#8217;t consist of evil in those proportions as is represented in lamescream. You should know it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6797/comment-page-1#comment-23159</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 01:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23159</guid>
		<description>Oh, I much agree Jon. You posted another article yesterday with this reflection echoed. I don&#039;t remember the name of it but it is still on the front page. Corporations have figured out that the iPod crowd now in colleges aren&#039;t listening to lamescream. They aren&#039;t going for the 6 o&#039;clock news, they aren&#039;t listening to radio, they aren&#039;t getting daily newspapers either. Ad companies are desperate to get a toe hold into these potential lost customers. Answer? Buy personal representation as a walking, living billboard with live, on the hoof testimonials. 

College kids making money by verbal endorsement of a given product to their peers. Something is seriously wrong with this invasion into what should be closed doors to those out for the buck. It sort of strikes me like the part in the movie Airplane where the pilot is running through the airport, rough handling all those orange robed initiates of a religious sect, to get those out of his path because he is in a hurry. 

I always figured that ads were a way of admitting the product being advertised doesn&#039;t live up to its billing. No one needs ads for those products that really work. People tell people what really works. Here that line is dividing. Should I run up on one of those kids being a paid, walking billboard, I assure you I will take it personally as an admission there is something wrong with that product also. 

Guess where my personal list of &quot;don&#039;t buys&quot; come from? They come from those products that don&#039;t live up to doing what they say they do satisfactorily. If it takes a lot of the product to do the job because the strength is watered down, think as a customer I might not be able to tell that? If I hear it heavily advertised, I purposely choose another at picking time while standing in front of the shelf at the store. I don&#039;t reward those that want to intrude on my hearing or viewing time with ads. I wish some of the rest of the world got this message and took it to heart. It would set the advertising world on its head and you would no longer see things like ads before a movie starts in a theater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I much agree Jon. You posted another article yesterday with this reflection echoed. I don&#8217;t remember the name of it but it is still on the front page. Corporations have figured out that the iPod crowd now in colleges aren&#8217;t listening to lamescream. They aren&#8217;t going for the 6 o&#8217;clock news, they aren&#8217;t listening to radio, they aren&#8217;t getting daily newspapers either. Ad companies are desperate to get a toe hold into these potential lost customers. Answer? Buy personal representation as a walking, living billboard with live, on the hoof testimonials. </p>
<p>College kids making money by verbal endorsement of a given product to their peers. Something is seriously wrong with this invasion into what should be closed doors to those out for the buck. It sort of strikes me like the part in the movie Airplane where the pilot is running through the airport, rough handling all those orange robed initiates of a religious sect, to get those out of his path because he is in a hurry. </p>
<p>I always figured that ads were a way of admitting the product being advertised doesn&#8217;t live up to its billing. No one needs ads for those products that really work. People tell people what really works. Here that line is dividing. Should I run up on one of those kids being a paid, walking billboard, I assure you I will take it personally as an admission there is something wrong with that product also. </p>
<p>Guess where my personal list of &#8220;don&#8217;t buys&#8221; come from? They come from those products that don&#8217;t live up to doing what they say they do satisfactorily. If it takes a lot of the product to do the job because the strength is watered down, think as a customer I might not be able to tell that? If I hear it heavily advertised, I purposely choose another at picking time while standing in front of the shelf at the store. I don&#8217;t reward those that want to intrude on my hearing or viewing time with ads. I wish some of the rest of the world got this message and took it to heart. It would set the advertising world on its head and you would no longer see things like ads before a movie starts in a theater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


