<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New: Sony BMG rootkit DRM</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6816</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6816#comment-24222</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6816#comment-24222</guid>
		<description>http://img469.imageshack.us/img469/1824/sonypriceless3tg.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://img469.imageshack.us/img469/1824/sonypriceless3tg.png" rel="nofollow">http://img469.imageshack.us/img469/1824/sonypriceless3tg.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6816#comment-23314</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 21:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6816#comment-23314</guid>
		<description>What happens if you hold the shift key or disable autorun?  Sounds like either one of these will let you bypass this rootkit DRM malware junk.  Will the disc still rip or does it have some other fair use restriction to prevent that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens if you hold the shift key or disable autorun?  Sounds like either one of these will let you bypass this rootkit DRM malware junk.  Will the disc still rip or does it have some other fair use restriction to prevent that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6816#comment-23309</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 19:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6816#comment-23309</guid>
		<description>I am wondering if anyone has a copy of this specific Sony CD.  It would be interesting to see how it will respond on a more secure computer such as Apples MacOS-X (underlying operating system is Darwin, a distribution of BSD Unix) or the various Linux distributions.

Most of the so-called "Copy Control" CDs I've heard of simply have data tracks on them that are simply ignored by the most common audio playing software, and thus the existence of this "Copy Control" is invisible to everyone but the Microsoft Windows users.

We know for certain that this malware can not install on anything other than Microsoft Windows so at least you know that by inserting the CD in other computers that it can't do any damage.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am wondering if anyone has a copy of this specific Sony CD.  It would be interesting to see how it will respond on a more secure computer such as Apples MacOS-X (underlying operating system is Darwin, a distribution of BSD Unix) or the various Linux distributions.</p>
<p>Most of the so-called &#8220;Copy Control&#8221; CDs I&#8217;ve heard of simply have data tracks on them that are simply ignored by the most common audio playing software, and thus the existence of this &#8220;Copy Control&#8221; is invisible to everyone but the Microsoft Windows users.</p>
<p>We know for certain that this malware can not install on anything other than Microsoft Windows so at least you know that by inserting the CD in other computers that it can&#8217;t do any damage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6816#comment-23308</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 19:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6816#comment-23308</guid>
		<description>In my BLOG entry for this story I asked people to write their MP.

http://www.digital-copyright.ca/node/1172

Someone commented to remember to mention section 430 of the Criminal Code of Canada.  While he suggested "particularly the part about rendering property dangerous.", I believe that (c) and (d) are sufficient and harder to argue against.

Remember: The only relevant "property owner" here is the owner of the computer, not the copyright holder of the music on the CD who has no legal right to damage your computer to protect the terms of their license agreements.


http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-46/43282.html#section-430

Mischief
430. (1) Every one commits mischief who wilfully

(a) destroys or damages property;

(b) renders property dangerous, useless, inoperative or ineffective;

(c) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property; or

(d) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with any person in the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my BLOG entry for this story I asked people to write their MP.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.digital-copyright.ca/node/1172" rel="nofollow">http://www.digital-copyright.ca/node/1172</a></p>
<p>Someone commented to remember to mention section 430 of the Criminal Code of Canada.  While he suggested &#8220;particularly the part about rendering property dangerous.&#8221;, I believe that (c) and (d) are sufficient and harder to argue against.</p>
<p>Remember: The only relevant &#8220;property owner&#8221; here is the owner of the computer, not the copyright holder of the music on the CD who has no legal right to damage your computer to protect the terms of their license agreements.</p>
<p><a href="http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-46/43282.html#section-430" rel="nofollow">http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-46/43282.html#section-430</a></p>
<p>Mischief<br />
430. (1) Every one commits mischief who wilfully</p>
<p>(a) destroys or damages property;</p>
<p>(b) renders property dangerous, useless, inoperative or ineffective;</p>
<p>(c) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property; or</p>
<p>(d) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with any person in the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6816#comment-23277</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 02:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6816#comment-23277</guid>
		<description>Linux time. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linux time. <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6816#comment-23263</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 00:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6816#comment-23263</guid>
		<description>If one purchases a CD and then proceeds to download the songs from that CD from p2p to make a backup copy, then Mr. Skoglund's assertion  that act constitutes an illegal use of file sharing is incorrect.  Making a backup copy has always been considered within the realm of fair use.

In fact, it's probably best to create the backup and use it when you wish to use that slbum.  This will preserve the integirty and greatly extend the operational life of the disk that you purchased to acquire the fair use rights to make the subsequent disk.

In IT, it's common practice to NOT use the media that came in the licensing kit, MSDN, or development environment kits, but only use those to make back-up copies for every day use.  In effect, you are merely designating the 'original' as a back up.

--TurboGeek
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If one purchases a CD and then proceeds to download the songs from that CD from p2p to make a backup copy, then Mr. Skoglund&#8217;s assertion  that act constitutes an illegal use of file sharing is incorrect.  Making a backup copy has always been considered within the realm of fair use.</p>
<p>In fact, it&#8217;s probably best to create the backup and use it when you wish to use that slbum.  This will preserve the integirty and greatly extend the operational life of the disk that you purchased to acquire the fair use rights to make the subsequent disk.</p>
<p>In IT, it&#8217;s common practice to NOT use the media that came in the licensing kit, MSDN, or development environment kits, but only use those to make back-up copies for every day use.  In effect, you are merely designating the &#8216;original&#8217; as a back up.</p>
<p>&#8211;TurboGeek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
