Comments on: US telecom bill worries Google http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6930 p2pnet.net - reader powered Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:30:38 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6930/comment-page-1#comment-24198 Reader's Write Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:42:37 +0000 #comment-24198 This is one of the reasons why I have been working to get FreeWan going. Once the Coporate-government alliances realize that the free flow of information is a true threat, they would block, restrict or drown out information that goes against their party line. This type of retriction can be done under a number of different excuses such as, elimination of spam, elimination of viruses, elimination of child pornography, (my favorite) "national security," regulation, taxation, and "fair use" (very restrictive to video information sharers). I wonder if the cartels would limit bandwidth usage for downloading cartel propaganda? This would be a good way of silencing alternative news- impose bandwidth controls on alternative video while making the excuse that these same limits shouldn't apply to content stored at the ISP because they aren't paying bandwidth costs to transmit this information. An example of a news story that the lamescream media companies are trying to bury is the fact that Minutemen founder Jim Gilchrist is running for Congress. The lamescream media is afraid of a non cartel sponsored candidate (i.e. someone from a party other than the Democrat-Republican Party) getting into office. Other intriguing stories also buried in the lamescream are also as likely to be blocked should the cartels have more power in ruling over the infrastructure of the Internet. This is one of the reasons why I have been working to get FreeWan going. Once the Coporate-government alliances realize that the free flow of information is a true threat, they would block, restrict or drown out information that goes against their party line. This type of retriction can be done under a number of different excuses such as, elimination of spam, elimination of viruses, elimination of child pornography, (my favorite) “national security,” regulation, taxation, and “fair use” (very restrictive to video information sharers). I wonder if the cartels would limit bandwidth usage for downloading cartel propaganda? This would be a good way of silencing alternative news- impose bandwidth controls on alternative video while making the excuse that these same limits shouldn’t apply to content stored at the ISP because they aren’t paying bandwidth costs to transmit this information.

An example of a news story that the lamescream media companies are trying to bury is the fact that Minutemen founder Jim Gilchrist is running for Congress. The lamescream media is afraid of a non cartel sponsored candidate (i.e. someone from a party other than the Democrat-Republican Party) getting into office. Other intriguing stories also buried in the lamescream are also as likely to be blocked should the cartels have more power in ruling over the infrastructure of the Internet.

]]>