Janet Jackson’s titillations
Justin Timberlake called it a “wardrobe malfunction”. FCC chairman Michael Powell called it “classless, crass and deplorable”.
TiVo owners just called it. And called it. And called it.
“TiVo said it used its technology to measure audience behavior among 20,000 users during the Super Bowl,” says a Reuters/Hollywood Reporter story here.
“The exercise revealed a 180% spike in viewership at the time of the ….”
Yep.
At the time of the exposure of Janet Jackson’s right mammary gland during yesterday’s Super Bowl.
TiVo’s top two commercials, “based on user behavior,” are a romantic sleigh ride interrupted by a flatulent horse, and a sharp-toothed dog demonstrating his unusual way of scoring a beer for his master adds the story.
[Someone's testicles are involved in the latter - Ed]
But Jackson’s revelation upset serial streaker Mark Roberts, from Liverpool, in England.
He was observed flashing briefly across the pitch – oops, field – just before the second half .
“He managed to do an Irish jig and the Moonwalk before being clobbered by a player and carried off the field by police,” says The Scotsman here.
“He calls himself a professional streaker’ and says he has advertising deals in Europe. But his exploit at the Super Bowl was the highlight of 11 years of going naked.”
February 3rd, 2004 at 6:14 pm
This attention getter was just that, and was planned, just as the attention has been given her brother. She just didn’t want her brother to get all the free publicity and her get none.
They both need a good phsychiatrist. Charlie Brown.
February 3rd, 2004 at 6:29 pm
This attention getter was just that, and was planned, just as the attention has been given her brother. She just didn’t want her brother to get all the free publicity and her get none.
They both need a good phsychiatrist. Charlie Brown.
February 3rd, 2004 at 6:42 pm
Obviously a stunt. No one , not even Janet Jackson, wears a nipple broch. However, the reaction to nudity in the US while there is mainstream acceptance of obscene violence and other horrid violent acts; is beyond perplexing. To what is worse?
February 3rd, 2004 at 7:20 pm
my god, have you seen what’s on tv. this is nothing compared to the g-strings and small tops that are on every night.
but this seems to be ok.
maybe you ppl should look at own morals every night.
get over it.
February 3rd, 2004 at 7:59 pm
I agree it was for attention.
B***t
February 3rd, 2004 at 8:38 pm
Missed the SuperBowl….
I just want to check out her sweet little ta ta on the internet.
Any video leads?
Poor Janet….I feel so embarrassed for her.
Poor Michael….Everyone persecutes him.
WHY DON’T THEY TRY WORKING FOR A LIVING!!!
February 3rd, 2004 at 8:40 pm
I feel that it is a cheap publicity that was used on the back of the Super Bowl organiser and put a damper on Football’s greatest show and game.
February 3rd, 2004 at 8:44 pm
You didn’t miss a thing…there is nothing sweet about her ta ta
February 3rd, 2004 at 9:36 pm
I am outraged! Outraged!! How dare you interrupt my gratuitous violence with [pseudo]nudity!!!
February 3rd, 2004 at 9:41 pm
Great Tits they are natural it’s to bad we could not see more.
February 4th, 2004 at 12:18 am
In reality the Timberlake/Jackson episode was a big yawn.. in itself no big deal, but their real intent was to tell the “suits” and their self serving commercial sponsors that they don’t yet own our collective souls.
The palpable hippocracy of it all… listening to the huffing and puffing of FCC’s oh so pious Powell and the Superbowl mandarins is almost laughable…. and I guess whatever goes into their toilet bowl doesn’t stink folks!
The real upset is of course… is that they lost the carefully coreographed control of every microsecond we see and hear. Funny how these holier-than-thou goofs consider farting horses and ads for erection enhancing (don’t we get enough of that crap in our daily email in-boxes?) drugs quite ok for our oh so tender eyes and ears…yet…. gimme a break!
My hat’s off to Timberlake and Jackson for giving them the collective finger.
Richard in Canada
February 4th, 2004 at 12:33 am
Why was’nt that little snot nose Justin holding a can of Nellie’s new product..”Pimp Juice”? (That is no joke boys and girls..on your grocery shelf soon). It would have been perfect…kinda tie the whole concept (or Ho concept if you will) together.
February 4th, 2004 at 12:41 am
I don’t know what all this fuss is about – a nation of prudes, in my opinion.
You are quite happy to have movies showing mass death and slaughter, most of you are happy to have guns in your cupboard and someone shows a boob and you get all righteous, what the….
Boobs… Whats the big deal?
Babies feed from them.
Girls become women and grow them
men spend a lifetime wanting to see more of them..
Get a grip and some perspective…
February 4th, 2004 at 1:12 am
Man! the guy who said “Great Tits, to bad we couldn’t see more! you are 1 major pervert!” it may be great but I think Justing knew the material of her outfit was flimsy and took a chance at ripping off that one side!
Didn’t he always like this lady?
February 4th, 2004 at 5:25 am
My thoughts exactly! I couldn’t have said it better myself.
Darrell,
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
February 6th, 2004 at 8:45 am
Whats the big deal? I dont think any of you who have said bad things about what happend ever so a movie i guess!!!! Rated R????
February 6th, 2004 at 8:46 am
Whats the big deal? I dont think any of you who have said bad things about what happend ever so a movie i guess!!!! Rated R????
Joe (Malta)
August 25th, 2004 at 12:50 am