Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Scroogle Search: 
Search
 
Web p2pnet   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
    Sponsored by
Frostwire
 
p2pnet
 


mp3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Critical iTunes security hole

p2p news / p2pnet: All versions of iTunes for Windows, including the most recent iTunes 6, have a critical security flaw leaves users’ systems open to hackers, says a security firm.

The flaw was reported by eEye Digital Security on Thursday which initially said all systems, including Macs, were affected.

A remotely exploitable flaw exists that allows arbitrary code to be executed in the context of the logged in user, it said.

However, an update says the flaw had been found only on Windows so far, says CNET News.

The company is currently running tests to see if testing the flaw also affects iTunes on Macs, says the story.

“The flaw enables malicious hackers to launch arbitrary code remotely, once a user clicks on a malicious Web site link or opens a malicious e-mail,” eEyeproduct manager Steve Manzuik is quoted as saying.

The hole was found shortly after Apple posted security updates for QuickTime and iTunes.

See:-
CNET NewsApple iTunes security flaw discovered, November 18, 2005

HOME

4 Responses to “Critical iTunes security hole”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    ITunes, whats that? some kind of DRM infected crap? who cares, not me :)

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    The Whoever is dumb enough to use this rubbish deserves everything they get, including buffer overruns galore.

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    wots a buffer overrun?

    wots a itune?

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    Another day another Criticial Security Hole.

    It’s called cutting costs to save money by not doing enough testing. Too bad it doesn’t work that way, because you end up spending more time (and money) fixing and refixing and unfixing that fix before trying a different fix for the first fix etc etc etc etc. You wind up spending a lot more money on all this fixing than you would ever have spent on complete testing in the first place.

    Of course try explaining something like that to a beancounter and you’ll get to watch their eyes glaze over as their tiny mind fails to keep up.

Leave a Reply

ONLY items referencing the post at hand, please. No links to personal sites, no personal attacks, trolling, freebie advertising, or off-topic posts. Thanks. And Cheers!

    Sponsored by
tek savvy