Winnie the Pooh gets a girl-friend
OT news / p2pnet: Winnie the Pooh, the cuddly little bear who’s been a friend to so many children as they were growing up, may soon have parents throwing up.
A.A. Milne wrote the Pooh stories for his son, Christopher Robin Milne, but it’s 2005 so apparently, the bear needs a little re-branding if it’s to continue making lots of money for Hollywood where nothing, absolutely nothing, is sacred.
Accordingly, sex is about to enter the life of Pooh.
USA Today says, “Guess who’s coming for honey? As part of a barrel-full of Winnie the Pooh anniversary events, Disney is working on a new animated series that will replace Christopher Robin with a 6-year-old girl.” Or as Britain’s The Mirror puts it, Babe ousts Christopher Robin.
“We got raised eyebrows even in-house at first, but the feeling was these timeless characters really needed a breath of fresh air that only the introduction of someone new could provide,” Disney’s Nancy Kanter told USA Today, which goes on.
“Disney said the new series will emphasise the active side of Pooh’s adventures as described in Milne’s original 1926 book to appeal to activity-loving children of pre-school age.
“Preston Kevin Lewis, director of the Pooh franchise, told Reuters: ‘Trust, friendship and happiness – Pooh doesn’t lose any of those things, it just changes how we talk about him’.”
What a load of old bollocks.
“Milne based his books on his musings about an imaginary world his son lived in. But Disney, who bought the rights in the 1960s, insist: ‘The introduction of the as yet-unnamed six-year-old in place of Christopher Robin will provide a way for us to tell even more wonderful, enriching stories’,” says The Mirror
“So they’re unlikely to change their minds about making the combat-trousered babe in the wood central to computer-generated My Friends Tigger and Pooh – due to air in 2007.”
Meanwhile, “Casting a shadow over Pooh’s 80th anniversary are continuing court battles over the rights to the franchise,” adds USA Today.
“Milne’s granddaughter, Clare Milne, who lives in England, is trying to reclaim the rights from Stephen Slesinger, the company that owns the North American merchandising rights.”
Also read:-
USA Today – Disney lets girl into Winnie’s world, December 6, 2005
The Mirror – POOH ARE YA?, December 9, 2005






December 9th, 2005 at 2:23 pm
I was under the impression that Pooh was Disney’s biggest merchandise seller, and a steady stream of income was coming from that area.
They seem to be taking a risk with what I would consider their best tradition. I hope it backfires on the suits.
December 9th, 2005 at 2:32 pm
uh, perhaps this new incarnation should be rated NC-17?
December 9th, 2005 at 2:44 pm
yeah except Disney owns the mpaa so they’ll just pass anyway
December 9th, 2005 at 3:28 pm
“may soon have parents throwing up.”
As a parent I can guarantee that!
December 9th, 2005 at 3:31 pm
Winnie the Pooh is Disney far more so then some mouse. If wasn’t for Winnie & friends there would be no Disney today, it would of been owned by Sony/Fox/TM.
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&hs=B43&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&q=winnie+the+pooh+legal+estate&spell=1
December 9th, 2005 at 3:57 pm
Would this be enough of a re-vamp to extend the rights holders
term length ? This seems more of an attempt to prevent Pooh
from going public domain.
December 9th, 2005 at 9:58 pm
Anyone else reminded of the “Poochie” episode on “The Simpsons”?
December 10th, 2005 at 12:45 am
Sorry to quibble
A (non-Disney) Pooh fan
December 10th, 2005 at 5:44 am
Pooh is already ‘broken’. The latest stories are just regular American cartoons with Pooh and friends as characters in them. It’s just wrong; they view more like Tom and Jerry or Bugs Bunny. I have a book where Christopher Robin goes to school, through the Hundred Acre Wood, in an American yellow school bus. Ouch!
December 10th, 2005 at 7:10 am
We need all new characters and all new stories, but that’s not going to happen with the current uncreative business idiots running the movie companies. They need to be fired and replaced with good, non-sellout artists.
December 10th, 2005 at 1:57 pm
Fixed. Pooh was, and still is, one of my daughter’s favourites. How could I have got it wrong?
Cheers!
December 11th, 2005 at 8:53 pm
We need to keep in mind that the current Disney Corporation has absolutely nothing to do with the goals and ideals of founder Walt Disney. It is now a money-making operation, pure and simple.
If they might ever think Winny the Pooh would make more money doing porno, it would be done tomorrow.