<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel boss scorns MIT laptop</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7272</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7272#comment-26172</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7272#comment-26172</guid>
		<description>Hehehehe.....

If this keeps up, then AMD is going to knock Intel from the top of the hill.  I think that's what Barrett fears the most.  I buy AMD exclusively nowadays.  Furthermore, Intel still doesn't have a workable 64-bit platform for the x86 processor family.  Their so called Itainium is a failure in the marketplace after how many years and billions invested?  I think this is why Intel is being so vindictive...corporate jealosy.  The Opteron is a superior product anyways, and it's cheaper.

Remeber folks, this is coming from a company that did everything they could to kill AMD...Just like what Microsoft did or try to do to their competitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehehehe&#8230;..</p>
<p>If this keeps up, then AMD is going to knock Intel from the top of the hill.  I think that&#8217;s what Barrett fears the most.  I buy AMD exclusively nowadays.  Furthermore, Intel still doesn&#8217;t have a workable 64-bit platform for the x86 processor family.  Their so called Itainium is a failure in the marketplace after how many years and billions invested?  I think this is why Intel is being so vindictive&#8230;corporate jealosy.  The Opteron is a superior product anyways, and it&#8217;s cheaper.</p>
<p>Remeber folks, this is coming from a company that did everything they could to kill AMD&#8230;Just like what Microsoft did or try to do to their competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7272#comment-26171</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7272#comment-26171</guid>
		<description>No money in it for Intel. Bet if there was, then this would be touted as the greatest invention since the abacus for helping third world countries. 

Want a corporations support? You do business with them. If they get cut out then sour grapes rules and it is not a product they will give support to in any manner, no matter the possibility of future business down the road. Most likely Intel didn't get the nod because their product is too expensive and they weren't willing to give up the profits to help out. 

Like every other corporation they want their cut. If it excludes them then never will the product be worthy. Toy or not, even calculator functions will work. That alone will be worth its weight in gold to those that don't have one. Since even the most basic computer is capable of time telling, calculating, teaching typing, and a multitude of other services and capabilities, this is just so much smoke blowing as it isn't their product in it. 

To those that have nothing, even cheap is a step up. Heavens forbid that they learn how to program and remove Intel from the scene entirely and go to churning out linux programs that you can be sure that both Jobs and Gates will condem. This small computer may not be capable of programing on large scale but certainly it can teach the basics. One never knows where that will lead, as kids are about finding out what makes things tick. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No money in it for Intel. Bet if there was, then this would be touted as the greatest invention since the abacus for helping third world countries. </p>
<p>Want a corporations support? You do business with them. If they get cut out then sour grapes rules and it is not a product they will give support to in any manner, no matter the possibility of future business down the road. Most likely Intel didn&#8217;t get the nod because their product is too expensive and they weren&#8217;t willing to give up the profits to help out. </p>
<p>Like every other corporation they want their cut. If it excludes them then never will the product be worthy. Toy or not, even calculator functions will work. That alone will be worth its weight in gold to those that don&#8217;t have one. Since even the most basic computer is capable of time telling, calculating, teaching typing, and a multitude of other services and capabilities, this is just so much smoke blowing as it isn&#8217;t their product in it. </p>
<p>To those that have nothing, even cheap is a step up. Heavens forbid that they learn how to program and remove Intel from the scene entirely and go to churning out linux programs that you can be sure that both Jobs and Gates will condem. This small computer may not be capable of programing on large scale but certainly it can teach the basics. One never knows where that will lead, as kids are about finding out what makes things tick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7272#comment-26136</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7272#comment-26136</guid>
		<description>Plain arrogance.

If you have no gas stations where you live or you cannot afford an automobile, a gadget like a bycicle will do fine. Just because one has a Mercedes is no reason to belittle the bycicle and/or their owners.

Anyway, if volume is high enough, the price of a good laptop can be reduced greatly through automation. If promotion adds are eliminated and replaced by word of mouth advertisements, costs can be further reduced. Then, and maybe this is the worrisome part for Mr. Barrett, if executive that make millions of dollars per year simply to manage (interfere may sometimes be the better word) the work of others, are not hired, prices will really drop. Then if you do not feed many shareholders that have become used to gargantuan gourmet meals and capital gains, you can hit the bottom cost of $100 or thereabout  per computer.

Rafael Venegas
http://www.gvenegas.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plain arrogance.</p>
<p>If you have no gas stations where you live or you cannot afford an automobile, a gadget like a bycicle will do fine. Just because one has a Mercedes is no reason to belittle the bycicle and/or their owners.</p>
<p>Anyway, if volume is high enough, the price of a good laptop can be reduced greatly through automation. If promotion adds are eliminated and replaced by word of mouth advertisements, costs can be further reduced. Then, and maybe this is the worrisome part for Mr. Barrett, if executive that make millions of dollars per year simply to manage (interfere may sometimes be the better word) the work of others, are not hired, prices will really drop. Then if you do not feed many shareholders that have become used to gargantuan gourmet meals and capital gains, you can hit the bottom cost of $100 or thereabout  per computer.</p>
<p>Rafael Venegas<br />
<a href="http://www.gvenegas.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gvenegas.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7272#comment-26112</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 05:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7272#comment-26112</guid>
		<description>Nuff said really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nuff said really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
