Comments on: More on CAAST bullshit study http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7322 p2pnet.net - reader powered Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7322/comment-page-1#comment-26403 Reader's Write Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:41:52 +0000 #comment-26403 Now that hits them where they live. There's no place in their market that such a business model can exist. Doesn't hide the fact that one exists, only that it doesn't fit them. It also smacks of making up figures from vaporous methods to attempt to justify their position. Just like the RIAA and MPAA its methods of determining a pirate station by how many burners are there by using the speed to determine numbers. a 40 speed burner doesn't equal 40-1 speed burners. Eye grabbing numbers is all this is about and nothing more. Has nothing to do with the reality of what is phyiscally there. Their assumption is everyone uses Winblows, therefore all computers must run Winblows. Well heres one that likes Linux and FLOSS. There's not even the application wine on it. Without Wine or a simular program, no program written for winblows will work. What that says, is that I am not running Winblows nor Winblows programs on it. Where does THAT fit in those numbers? Yet another smoke and mirrors claim is all the above amounts to. It is designed to be released just before some upcoming legistation to be referred to when it comes time as an "established survey" but in reality has no meaning and is certainly a stranger to truth. Now that hits them where they live. There’s no place in their market that such a business model can exist. Doesn’t hide the fact that one exists, only that it doesn’t fit them.

It also smacks of making up figures from vaporous methods to attempt to justify their position. Just like the RIAA and MPAA its methods of determining a pirate station by how many burners are there by using the speed to determine numbers. a 40 speed burner doesn’t equal 40-1 speed burners. Eye grabbing numbers is all this is about and nothing more. Has nothing to do with the reality of what is phyiscally there.

Their assumption is everyone uses Winblows, therefore all computers must run Winblows. Well heres one that likes Linux and FLOSS. There’s not even the application wine on it. Without Wine or a simular program, no program written for winblows will work. What that says, is that I am not running Winblows nor Winblows programs on it. Where does THAT fit in those numbers?

Yet another smoke and mirrors claim is all the above amounts to. It is designed to be released just before some upcoming legistation to be referred to when it comes time as an “established survey” but in reality has no meaning and is certainly a stranger to truth.

]]>