<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kazaa survives. For now</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7326</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7326#comment-26469</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7326#comment-26469</guid>
		<description>This sounds like someone with an irrational grudge against Kazaa. 

Maybe you should be considering the ramifications, if any, that might come about from this trial. I know the US doesn't take precedents from foreign courts but the RIAA will try and push for the same anyway. I feel that in the end, the Music Cartel will be forced to accept a filtering system which will be legal but ineffective. As long as the p2p industry is trying to improve or at least implement a filtering system no court will shut them down, which is actually what the cartel wants. If the judge determines that the cartel are not approaching the judgement as directed, the cartel just might have whatever basic filtering Kazaa offers thrusted upon them by the court. Maybe at some point the almost sheer impossibility of totally filtering all cartel content will seep into the brains of these courts and maybe then we can fall back on infringing use percentage being reduced enough through filtering so maybe a sort of betamax compromise can be reached.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like someone with an irrational grudge against Kazaa. </p>
<p>Maybe you should be considering the ramifications, if any, that might come about from this trial. I know the US doesn&#8217;t take precedents from foreign courts but the RIAA will try and push for the same anyway. I feel that in the end, the Music Cartel will be forced to accept a filtering system which will be legal but ineffective. As long as the p2p industry is trying to improve or at least implement a filtering system no court will shut them down, which is actually what the cartel wants. If the judge determines that the cartel are not approaching the judgement as directed, the cartel just might have whatever basic filtering Kazaa offers thrusted upon them by the court. Maybe at some point the almost sheer impossibility of totally filtering all cartel content will seep into the brains of these courts and maybe then we can fall back on infringing use percentage being reduced enough through filtering so maybe a sort of betamax compromise can be reached.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7326#comment-26441</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7326#comment-26441</guid>
		<description>To the second poster, when you say “they are talking about a prison sentence”, you mean “you” don’t you? Or do you think reference to the Book of Wisdom will move you faster along the road to a G&#038;T partnership?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the second poster, when you say “they are talking about a prison sentence”, you mean “you” don’t you? Or do you think reference to the Book of Wisdom will move you faster along the road to a G&#038;T partnership?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7326#comment-26439</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7326#comment-26439</guid>
		<description>Hey Nikki , there's no right way to do the wrong thing. Your lust for money, power and significance have corrupted you. Your word is worthless. You Sold Out and you get everything, everything that goes with that. The shear fact that they (refer to Zdnet coverage) are talking about a prison sentence for you and dodgy Kev is massive feedback from your Universe that you are offtrack. And you Created Promoted and Allowed the lot. You use to refer to yourself as "a wise women, enjoying her journey" well the first chapter in the Book of Wisdom is Honesty. You Nikki have majored in dishonesty. Only you can set things right and make amends for what you have done, and it is not going to get any easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nikki , there&#8217;s no right way to do the wrong thing. Your lust for money, power and significance have corrupted you. Your word is worthless. You Sold Out and you get everything, everything that goes with that. The shear fact that they (refer to Zdnet coverage) are talking about a prison sentence for you and dodgy Kev is massive feedback from your Universe that you are offtrack. And you Created Promoted and Allowed the lot. You use to refer to yourself as &#8220;a wise women, enjoying her journey&#8221; well the first chapter in the Book of Wisdom is Honesty. You Nikki have majored in dishonesty. Only you can set things right and make amends for what you have done, and it is not going to get any easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7326#comment-26438</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7326#comment-26438</guid>
		<description>Somehow I see no mention of the failure of the ARIA technical staff to ensure that the goals would be met. Without benefit of that guidance, how can Kaaza reasonably meet the intent of the judge's rulings? 

Instead it looks like the ARIA wants to have its cake and eat it too. Kaaza plainly said that they could handle a 3000 word filter. Somehow the ARIA missed that till the next court date to update the progress. All of a sudden 3000 words, that seemed adequate at the first meeting, was never mentioned in the second meeting that was to have happened and didn't, was suddenly no longer meeting the goals. Instead what never occured to the ARIA in pressing this case was that the judge might recognise that Kaaza was a business, that he would be reluctant to close a business that attempted to meet the requirements of his ruling, and the only way they could throw a wrench in the plans was by making sure that Kaaza had no guidance in how to fulfill the judges rulings so that the results would be guarenteed to be unsatisfactory. Ergo, the remaining option then would be to shut down Kaaza. 

Only the ARIA hasn't met its part of the bargain to see that Kaaza at least had the chance to resolve the issue properly. They can't get the whole thing without doing their part. I don't see the judge ruling to shutdown Kaaza on the basis of this as long as Kaaza was showing it was trying to the best of its abilities to do as the ruling require. The failure of the ARIA to supply the needed parts to make sure the copywrite holders were satisfied has somehow been left out of this mess. Somehow I don't think the judge will be satisfied with the ARIA's performance in this. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow I see no mention of the failure of the ARIA technical staff to ensure that the goals would be met. Without benefit of that guidance, how can Kaaza reasonably meet the intent of the judge&#8217;s rulings? </p>
<p>Instead it looks like the ARIA wants to have its cake and eat it too. Kaaza plainly said that they could handle a 3000 word filter. Somehow the ARIA missed that till the next court date to update the progress. All of a sudden 3000 words, that seemed adequate at the first meeting, was never mentioned in the second meeting that was to have happened and didn&#8217;t, was suddenly no longer meeting the goals. Instead what never occured to the ARIA in pressing this case was that the judge might recognise that Kaaza was a business, that he would be reluctant to close a business that attempted to meet the requirements of his ruling, and the only way they could throw a wrench in the plans was by making sure that Kaaza had no guidance in how to fulfill the judges rulings so that the results would be guarenteed to be unsatisfactory. Ergo, the remaining option then would be to shut down Kaaza. </p>
<p>Only the ARIA hasn&#8217;t met its part of the bargain to see that Kaaza at least had the chance to resolve the issue properly. They can&#8217;t get the whole thing without doing their part. I don&#8217;t see the judge ruling to shutdown Kaaza on the basis of this as long as Kaaza was showing it was trying to the best of its abilities to do as the ruling require. The failure of the ARIA to supply the needed parts to make sure the copywrite holders were satisfied has somehow been left out of this mess. Somehow I don&#8217;t think the judge will be satisfied with the ARIA&#8217;s performance in this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
