<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia anti-vandalism move</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7350</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7350#comment-26634</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7350#comment-26634</guid>
		<description>They do have something like that called 'discussion' where people work out what is what before publishing or to dispute an entry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They do have something like that called &#8216;discussion&#8217; where people work out what is what before publishing or to dispute an entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7350#comment-26628</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7350#comment-26628</guid>
		<description>Wouldnt it be easier for edits that aren't done by the original author to appear seperately from the original article much like the comments to articles on this forum?

Then you'd see the original article and all other comments, criticisms and additions all at once. Ok it'd increase the size of popular topics a great deal, but at least you'd be able to follow the evolution of the article instead of only seeing the latest version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldnt it be easier for edits that aren&#8217;t done by the original author to appear seperately from the original article much like the comments to articles on this forum?</p>
<p>Then you&#8217;d see the original article and all other comments, criticisms and additions all at once. Ok it&#8217;d increase the size of popular topics a great deal, but at least you&#8217;d be able to follow the evolution of the article instead of only seeing the latest version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7350#comment-26615</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7350#comment-26615</guid>
		<description>One bad apple spoils the bunch, and copy-cat kiddies -- for shame! 

It's shame that wikipedia is under so much fire right now.  I have always view it as one of the most important organizations on the web today.  To all the 'Vandals' sitting your "r3n7'5" basement.  Get a life, leave one of the only bias free source for information on the net alone.  To all those that discredit the wiki projects -- "what are you afraid of?  People speaking the truth to each other without bias?"  Some people cannot be paid for and a project such as wikipedia will always be free, open and honest to the best of its 'true' communities ability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One bad apple spoils the bunch, and copy-cat kiddies &#8212; for shame! </p>
<p>It&#8217;s shame that wikipedia is under so much fire right now.  I have always view it as one of the most important organizations on the web today.  To all the &#8216;Vandals&#8217; sitting your &#8220;r3n7&#8242;5&#8243; basement.  Get a life, leave one of the only bias free source for information on the net alone.  To all those that discredit the wiki projects &#8212; &#8220;what are you afraid of?  People speaking the truth to each other without bias?&#8221;  Some people cannot be paid for and a project such as wikipedia will always be free, open and honest to the best of its &#8216;true&#8217; communities ability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
