<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia anti-vandalism move</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7350/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7350</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7350/comment-page-1#comment-26634</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-26634</guid>
		<description>They do have something like that called &#039;discussion&#039; where people work out what is what before publishing or to dispute an entry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They do have something like that called &#8216;discussion&#8217; where people work out what is what before publishing or to dispute an entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7350/comment-page-1#comment-26628</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-26628</guid>
		<description>Wouldnt it be easier for edits that aren&#039;t done by the original author to appear seperately from the original article much like the comments to articles on this forum?

Then you&#039;d see the original article and all other comments, criticisms and additions all at once. Ok it&#039;d increase the size of popular topics a great deal, but at least you&#039;d be able to follow the evolution of the article instead of only seeing the latest version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldnt it be easier for edits that aren&#8217;t done by the original author to appear seperately from the original article much like the comments to articles on this forum?</p>
<p>Then you&#8217;d see the original article and all other comments, criticisms and additions all at once. Ok it&#8217;d increase the size of popular topics a great deal, but at least you&#8217;d be able to follow the evolution of the article instead of only seeing the latest version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7350/comment-page-1#comment-26615</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-26615</guid>
		<description>One bad apple spoils the bunch, and copy-cat kiddies -- for shame! 

It&#039;s shame that wikipedia is under so much fire right now.  I have always view it as one of the most important organizations on the web today.  To all the &#039;Vandals&#039; sitting your &quot;r3n7&#039;5&quot; basement.  Get a life, leave one of the only bias free source for information on the net alone.  To all those that discredit the wiki projects -- &quot;what are you afraid of?  People speaking the truth to each other without bias?&quot;  Some people cannot be paid for and a project such as wikipedia will always be free, open and honest to the best of its &#039;true&#039; communities ability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One bad apple spoils the bunch, and copy-cat kiddies &#8212; for shame! </p>
<p>It&#8217;s shame that wikipedia is under so much fire right now.  I have always view it as one of the most important organizations on the web today.  To all the &#8216;Vandals&#8217; sitting your &#8220;r3n7&#8242;5&#8243; basement.  Get a life, leave one of the only bias free source for information on the net alone.  To all those that discredit the wiki projects &#8212; &#8220;what are you afraid of?  People speaking the truth to each other without bias?&#8221;  Some people cannot be paid for and a project such as wikipedia will always be free, open and honest to the best of its &#8216;true&#8217; communities ability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


