<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google bans kozoru</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7383/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7383</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7383/comment-page-1#comment-27121</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-27121</guid>
		<description>F%&amp;$ google, they did the same thing to me recently actually.
My suggestion is this.  Google never asks for premission to search other sites and reuse their content so why should we have to?  I developed a way or parsing their results without their API and I would happily supply it to anyone who wants it.  gregslost &#124;at&#124; yahoo &#124;dot&#124; com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F%&#038;$ google, they did the same thing to me recently actually.<br />
My suggestion is this.  Google never asks for premission to search other sites and reuse their content so why should we have to?  I developed a way or parsing their results without their API and I would happily supply it to anyone who wants it.  gregslost |at| yahoo |dot| com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7383/comment-page-1#comment-27076</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-27076</guid>
		<description>Boy o&#039; boy, this smells ....sniff...sniff...sniff....yes...it...does...
exactly smells just like the evil Msft!
That&#039;s exactly their strategy....kill anything better or threatening...Google&#039;s going down the dark path.
Sad.
The people&#039;s needs mean nothing.  Revenue is the holy grail.

Doing this will lead to their demise, just as Msft is feeling now...the slow downhill slide to the bottom where they belong.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy o&#8217; boy, this smells &#8230;.sniff&#8230;sniff&#8230;sniff&#8230;.yes&#8230;it&#8230;does&#8230;<br />
exactly smells just like the evil Msft!<br />
That&#8217;s exactly their strategy&#8230;.kill anything better or threatening&#8230;Google&#8217;s going down the dark path.<br />
Sad.<br />
The people&#8217;s needs mean nothing.  Revenue is the holy grail.</p>
<p>Doing this will lead to their demise, just as Msft is feeling now&#8230;the slow downhill slide to the bottom where they belong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7383/comment-page-1#comment-26884</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-26884</guid>
		<description>i agree that they shouldn&#039;t be blocked from the system, especially if google was deliberately destroying results.  if their system is better, they should spider their own pages probably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree that they shouldn&#8217;t be blocked from the system, especially if google was deliberately destroying results.  if their system is better, they should spider their own pages probably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


