<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A two-tiered internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7409/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7409</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:23:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7409/comment-page-1#comment-26924</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-26924</guid>
		<description>Thanks to Mr. Geist for bringing up the subject. Certailny we should be on the lookout to what celf centered ISP&#039;s may want to do unjustly to increase their profits.

In the physical world the post office and Federal Express are similar to ISP&#039;s: They deliver the goods. With these, if there is real competition what ISPs may want to do (favor some, block others) it cannot be done, because the customers will migrate elsewhere, say from Federal Express to the postal service.

So, the major problem could be the lack of competition among the ISPs. which could happen if a monopoly exists if, for example, only one ISP exists for a given market or if several ISP&#039;s formed an ISP association or if one ISP buys out the others.

Most governments (I think) allege to be against monopolies but contradictorily allow &quot;associations&quot; to be created within an industry (and even professions) and when you look closely at what the so called &quot;association&quot; does, it is mainly the setting up of monopolistic practices, such as the setting up of price structures, limiting competition and making entry into the business impossible, things that can be done directly by the &quot;assiciation&quot; members directly or by lobbying for legislation. RIAA, MPAA, ASCAP, etc. are good examples. 

My point: We should be on the lookout to see what the ISP&#039;s propose and what legislators legislate and what the government regulatory agencies decide, corporate consolidations and buyouts, and the formation and activities of the so called &quot;associations&quot;. In short, monopoly formation.

Rafael Venegas
http://www.gvenegas.com

 
 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Mr. Geist for bringing up the subject. Certailny we should be on the lookout to what celf centered ISP&#8217;s may want to do unjustly to increase their profits.</p>
<p>In the physical world the post office and Federal Express are similar to ISP&#8217;s: They deliver the goods. With these, if there is real competition what ISPs may want to do (favor some, block others) it cannot be done, because the customers will migrate elsewhere, say from Federal Express to the postal service.</p>
<p>So, the major problem could be the lack of competition among the ISPs. which could happen if a monopoly exists if, for example, only one ISP exists for a given market or if several ISP&#8217;s formed an ISP association or if one ISP buys out the others.</p>
<p>Most governments (I think) allege to be against monopolies but contradictorily allow &#8220;associations&#8221; to be created within an industry (and even professions) and when you look closely at what the so called &#8220;association&#8221; does, it is mainly the setting up of monopolistic practices, such as the setting up of price structures, limiting competition and making entry into the business impossible, things that can be done directly by the &#8220;assiciation&#8221; members directly or by lobbying for legislation. RIAA, MPAA, ASCAP, etc. are good examples. </p>
<p>My point: We should be on the lookout to see what the ISP&#8217;s propose and what legislators legislate and what the government regulatory agencies decide, corporate consolidations and buyouts, and the formation and activities of the so called &#8220;associations&#8221;. In short, monopoly formation.</p>
<p>Rafael Venegas<br />
<a href="http://www.gvenegas.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gvenegas.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7409/comment-page-1#comment-26918</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 07:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-26918</guid>
		<description>True, and that might stop them once the lawyers point it out to them. 

Or it might simply be a great excuse to block all traffic that doesn&#039;t come from them or their &quot;trusted partners&quot;. &quot;For our customers safety and convenience&quot; of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, and that might stop them once the lawyers point it out to them. </p>
<p>Or it might simply be a great excuse to block all traffic that doesn&#8217;t come from them or their &#8220;trusted partners&#8221;. &#8220;For our customers safety and convenience&#8221; of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7409/comment-page-1#comment-26913</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 04:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-26913</guid>
		<description>Network neutrality was originally a telecommunications concept that didn&#039;t apply to information services.  But the difference between the two services has become blurred, with everything traveling as packets.  Let us hope that the principle of network neutrality becomes law everywhere rather than being mere principle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Network neutrality was originally a telecommunications concept that didn&#8217;t apply to information services.  But the difference between the two services has become blurred, with everything traveling as packets.  Let us hope that the principle of network neutrality becomes law everywhere rather than being mere principle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7409/comment-page-1#comment-26906</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 01:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-26906</guid>
		<description>Seems like taking the two tiered &quot;managed&quot; stance will open the doors for floods of lawsuits since the ISPs will know what thier traffic contains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like taking the two tiered &#8220;managed&#8221; stance will open the doors for floods of lawsuits since the ISPs will know what thier traffic contains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
