Yep. The republicans and the democrats are on the take of businesses. “Fuck the people, we are supported by big lobby”, is the politician’s way of thinking.

Sure Bush did not start the Cuban embargo, but by continuing it he makes things worse for Americans in Latin America and in America itself, all for the votes of the Cubans in Florida, needed by his brother.

“The saudis caused 9/11? Are you sure about that?”
Most of the 9/11 terrorists were from Saudi Arabia. These terrorists came from a society that is really pissed at the Saudi family, a bunch of despots which are backed up by the Bush administration since daddy was president and before. If you are unaware what has happened, see the movie Farenheit 9/11.

“- yes, intelligence wasn’t up to par, so impeach a president who wouldn’t have had time to correct it, even if he wanted to.”

Bush has shown he did not do anything to correct the intelligence problems, which continue to this day. By the time that 9/11 hapenned, he had not even realized how weak we were in intelligence. His study of the matter (if that were possible) should have begun before he considered wanting to become president so that the clean up started before 9/11. Surely a candidate that was the son of a president who himself had been CIA Director should have been well aware of the problems in the intelligence systems and should have started changes from day 1. Instead he came up with Homeland after 9/11, a failure, as shown by Katrina.

“- The reasons for going to war notwithstanding, Saddam had to be removed sooner or later. He has no regard for human life, and for some reason, members of the UN don’t like messing with a country’s leadership, if it that leadership is one built on oppression. So just because the UN wouldn’t back us in Irak, doesn’t mean it was the wrong decision.”

Sure, we could have been for the removal of Saddam, but that was the business of the people of Irak only. Then it is possible that the losses for the people of Irak are far greater as a result of the war. For the US they certainly are.

“- I’d like you to point out the article in which you make your last point, because I haven’t seen or heard anything like that.”

Has Bush said anything about the criminalization and blackmailing of p2p downloaders? Or any Republican leader? The silence speaks for itself.

- rep in latin america – The cuban embargo has been ongoing for quite some time, so I doubt we’ve lost more rep because Bush hasn’t ceased it.

The saudis caused 9/11? Are you sure about that? Do you know the real reason the terrorists attacked us? B/c unless you’ve directly talked to the masterminds behind the attacks, you don’t have a bloody clue. No one does. You can’t blame Bush for that. We didn’t have the infrastructure in place to protect ourselves from the manner in which they attacked us. But it’s ok, blame a president who had been in office for a whopping 9 months. He definitely should have done something.

- yes, intelligence wasn’t up to par, so impeach a president who wouldn’t have had time to correct it, even if he wanted to.

- Katrina was a disaster in every definition. FEMA was broke, communications broke. Not an impeachable offense.

- The reasons for going to war notwithstanding, Saddam had to be removed sooner or later. He has no regard for human life, and for some reason, members of the UN don’t like messing with a country’s leadership, if it that leadership is one built on oppression. So just because the UN wouldn’t back us in Iraq, doesn’t mean it was the wrong decision.

- I’d like you to point out the article in which you make your last point, because I haven’t seen or heard anything like that.

Loss of reputation in Latin America because of the stupid Cuban embargo, while supporting the despotic Saudis (the cause of 9/11).

An non working intelligence that did not work to prevent 9/11.

A homeland security that did not work whe it really counted, during Katrina.

A war that has solved nothing (Iraq).

With Bush’s consent, the criminalization of America by the copyright cartels that think that buying off the party-cracy they can control the people.

Bush should have been impeached a long time ago, but the party-cracy stoped working a long time ago.