<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iTunes MiniStore spyware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7608/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7608</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7608/comment-page-1#comment-30517</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 07:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-30517</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve emailed Apple several times REQUESTING this specific feature, so I&#039;m glad to see it&#039;s finally able to see the light of day.  Getting recommendations only on music I&#039;ve bought from iTMS when I&#039;ve got over 5k other songs on my computer from the CD collection I built in all the years before iTMS has been pretty ... inaccurate and frustrating.  I&#039;m more than happy to share information about what I listen to the most.  If it uses historical data as well, even better, since I&#039;ve been using iTunes on my PCs and Macs since day one.

I definitely agree that it should have been spelled out more clearly than it was; in most of my emails to Apple I suggested that they launch it as a &quot;new feature&quot; or &quot;improvement&quot; with a logo and a catchy name so when people first hear about it, it will be in a positive light of what it does for them (better recommendations) rather than a negative light (see: this paranoid article).  Yes, the corporations want information about our behaviour so that they can get us to spend more of our money on their products --- but the more information they have about us, the more likely they money we&#039;re spending is on something we REALLY want, rather than just whatever they decided got the advertising dollars this year (see: the publishing industry).  iTMS probably has 20k songs in its 2m+ song library that I&#039;d love, but without better recommendations, there&#039;s no way for me to find them ... and try to find the $20k it would cost to buy them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve emailed Apple several times REQUESTING this specific feature, so I&#8217;m glad to see it&#8217;s finally able to see the light of day.  Getting recommendations only on music I&#8217;ve bought from iTMS when I&#8217;ve got over 5k other songs on my computer from the CD collection I built in all the years before iTMS has been pretty &#8230; inaccurate and frustrating.  I&#8217;m more than happy to share information about what I listen to the most.  If it uses historical data as well, even better, since I&#8217;ve been using iTunes on my PCs and Macs since day one.</p>
<p>I definitely agree that it should have been spelled out more clearly than it was; in most of my emails to Apple I suggested that they launch it as a &#8220;new feature&#8221; or &#8220;improvement&#8221; with a logo and a catchy name so when people first hear about it, it will be in a positive light of what it does for them (better recommendations) rather than a negative light (see: this paranoid article).  Yes, the corporations want information about our behaviour so that they can get us to spend more of our money on their products &#8212; but the more information they have about us, the more likely they money we&#8217;re spending is on something we REALLY want, rather than just whatever they decided got the advertising dollars this year (see: the publishing industry).  iTMS probably has 20k songs in its 2m+ song library that I&#8217;d love, but without better recommendations, there&#8217;s no way for me to find them &#8230; and try to find the $20k it would cost to buy them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7608/comment-page-1#comment-30512</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 02:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-30512</guid>
		<description>Ironic isn&#039;t it that one of the main points the RIAA makes against using p2p services is viruses and spyware.

Looks like their supposedly legal services come prepackaged with spyware, heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironic isn&#8217;t it that one of the main points the RIAA makes against using p2p services is viruses and spyware.</p>
<p>Looks like their supposedly legal services come prepackaged with spyware, heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


