<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dangerous Windows wireless flaw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7629/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7629</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7629/comment-page-1#comment-31209</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-31209</guid>
		<description>The whole problem is that the majority of ppl out there DON&#039;T take any precautions!

The lamescream media doesn&#039;t help with totally useless &quot;articles&quot; or &quot;expose&#039;s&quot; on computer security that don&#039;t tell you what to do.

All apps, OS&#039;s and hardware should be locked down by default and you should have to manually turn anything on. Also it should be hard to turn any potentially risky features on, requiring a read through the manual which should explain the security risks in plain language. This would reduce the scope of the problem a bit.

Of course it&#039;ll never happen. Ppl are so in love with convenience they&#039;d happily rfid chip themselves if it meant taking a few minutes less time in a supermarket queue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole problem is that the majority of ppl out there DON&#8217;T take any precautions!</p>
<p>The lamescream media doesn&#8217;t help with totally useless &#8220;articles&#8221; or &#8220;expose&#8217;s&#8221; on computer security that don&#8217;t tell you what to do.</p>
<p>All apps, OS&#8217;s and hardware should be locked down by default and you should have to manually turn anything on. Also it should be hard to turn any potentially risky features on, requiring a read through the manual which should explain the security risks in plain language. This would reduce the scope of the problem a bit.</p>
<p>Of course it&#8217;ll never happen. Ppl are so in love with convenience they&#8217;d happily rfid chip themselves if it meant taking a few minutes less time in a supermarket queue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7629/comment-page-1#comment-31088</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-31088</guid>
		<description>I was just about to write about number 5.
5. Click on &quot;Access point (infrastructure) networks only&quot;

Thats how i setup all my windows laptops anyway. Thats pretty much common sense.

Even so, it doesn&#039;t pose a serious threat, unless of course you are in the habit of sharing your drives root.

I wouldn&#039;t really classify it as a flaw, it&#039;s like saying file and printer sharing is a security flaw. These things only pose a threat when no precautions are taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just about to write about number 5.<br />
5. Click on &#8220;Access point (infrastructure) networks only&#8221;</p>
<p>Thats how i setup all my windows laptops anyway. Thats pretty much common sense.</p>
<p>Even so, it doesn&#8217;t pose a serious threat, unless of course you are in the habit of sharing your drives root.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t really classify it as a flaw, it&#8217;s like saying file and printer sharing is a security flaw. These things only pose a threat when no precautions are taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7629/comment-page-1#comment-31075</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-31075</guid>
		<description>You guys ever seen the directional WiFi antenna made out of a pringles can?  Here&#039;s more info:

http://geekswithblogs.net/lorint

(Not trying to help anyone pull off this exploit in mentioning this, I just found it interesting and related!)

-Lorin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys ever seen the directional WiFi antenna made out of a pringles can?  Here&#8217;s more info:</p>
<p><a href="http://geekswithblogs.net/lorint" rel="nofollow">http://geekswithblogs.net/lorint</a></p>
<p>(Not trying to help anyone pull off this exploit in mentioning this, I just found it interesting and related!)</p>
<p>-Lorin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


