Comments on: Google rejects Bush demand

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:45:51 +0000

There is a simple solution that Google can make available quickly to resolve this problem: Let the users define the encryption keys that google desktop would use to encrypt the data like RSA and ultimately opensource the encryption API so that neutral third parties like PGP or else could implement open encryption libraries that would not be controlled by Google.

That way, Google would effectively be unable to access to the user’s content, making subpeanas from the government to access the data virtually meaningless…

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 24 Jan 2006 04:14:36 +0000

What does Google think they are above the law. Low Lifes! They should be doing everything they can to stop the proliferation of child porn sites. Google sucks.

And I’m not an anonymous coward. There was nowhere to list the source.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:18:08 +0000

Yes. very interesting the fact that so many websites link to George W. Bush’s bio with the description of “miserable failure” to skew Google’s results like that.

It’s also interesting to note that Jimmy Carter’s bio is the number 2 result.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 22 Jan 2006 06:27:27 +0000

Even though your link is broken, I copied and pasted it into my browser and saw what you meant.

NOW, go to:

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/09/googlebombing-failure.html

Which is listed as “Why these results” at the right-hand side of your page and READ that….

Interesting, eh?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:25:00 +0000

remember typing in “miserable failure” in google?

http://www.google.com/search?q=miserable+failure&sourceid=mozilla-search&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official

if google caves, bush might not be the number 1 miserable failure any longer.