<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Vista boss on Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7761/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7761</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7761/comment-page-1#comment-32897</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-32897</guid>
		<description>There are some programs that are designed to run at kernal level. its those programs that I am talking about and as far as other drivers i covered that also. To install them u must be in admin if not signed. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some programs that are designed to run at kernal level. its those programs that I am talking about and as far as other drivers i covered that also. To install them u must be in admin if not signed. <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7761/comment-page-1#comment-32894</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-32894</guid>
		<description>Haha! You&#039;re wrong.  The open-source software modules you&#039;re talking about that run at driver level don&#039;t need to run at kernel driver level.  LHDDM splits drivers into 2 levels 
User Driver Level and Kernel Driver Level.  Almost everything that we use now (video card drivers, sound card drivers, etc.) will run on the user driver level.  Motherboard stuff will run at kernel level along with stuff like that </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha! You&#8217;re wrong.  The open-source software modules you&#8217;re talking about that run at driver level don&#8217;t need to run at kernel driver level.  LHDDM splits drivers into 2 levels<br />
User Driver Level and Kernel Driver Level.  Almost everything that we use now (video card drivers, sound card drivers, etc.) will run on the user driver level.  Motherboard stuff will run at kernel level along with stuff like that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7761/comment-page-1#comment-32892</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 07:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-32892</guid>
		<description>Vista x64 will require kernal level drivers to be signed. So much for open source software that has a driver that runs at that level. They say it will be an answer to &quot;security&quot;. And this is true. this is a line straight from a email from Microsoft. &quot;Unsigned kernel-mode software will not load and will not run on x64-based systems.&quot; Also unsigned drivers that don&#039;t run at the kernal level will require to be under a Admin account as stated here which came from the email. &quot;Users who are not administrators cannot install device drivers that don&#039;t have digital signatures.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vista x64 will require kernal level drivers to be signed. So much for open source software that has a driver that runs at that level. They say it will be an answer to &#8220;security&#8221;. And this is true. this is a line straight from a email from Microsoft. &#8220;Unsigned kernel-mode software will not load and will not run on x64-based systems.&#8221; Also unsigned drivers that don&#8217;t run at the kernal level will require to be under a Admin account as stated here which came from the email. &#8220;Users who are not administrators cannot install device drivers that don&#8217;t have digital signatures.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7761/comment-page-1#comment-32867</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 02:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-32867</guid>
		<description>&quot;... I don&#039;t think people even think about their machines having to be rebooted, not like they used to be in the old days.&quot;

I&#039;m a FreeBSD user for several years now, but anytime I am forced into a situation where I must use Windows (such as at work, Win2K, or my folks home, WinXP) I still see the constant need for reboots.  Whether it&#039;s tweaking a simple setting or recovering from leaky programs and other nonsense, the reboot problem is just as bad as it always was.  This guy is full of it.  As everyone knows, keeping legacy support for ancient, insecure programs will ensure that Vista is as insecure as it predecessors.  Geeez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; I don&#8217;t think people even think about their machines having to be rebooted, not like they used to be in the old days.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a FreeBSD user for several years now, but anytime I am forced into a situation where I must use Windows (such as at work, Win2K, or my folks home, WinXP) I still see the constant need for reboots.  Whether it&#8217;s tweaking a simple setting or recovering from leaky programs and other nonsense, the reboot problem is just as bad as it always was.  This guy is full of it.  As everyone knows, keeping legacy support for ancient, insecure programs will ensure that Vista is as insecure as it predecessors.  Geeez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


