Comments on: Why DRM can’t work

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:04:15 +0000

Looks like two people to me, one had a gripe and fixed it with the author, the other is a cock fucknut who can’t leave people alone. I’d fucking shove my thunder-foot up his anus if I met him

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:49:04 +0000

It’s all the same person. The guy is psycho.

By: Bill

Bill — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:00:05 +0000

Now it looks like someone is talking shit about Jody on 800notes.com and CallFerret. I’m amazed that one person scares these I.T. amateurs so damn bad that they have to behave like this. I’m shocked Jody isn’t tracking them down or something…..

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 02:47:49 +0000

I posted an ad on CL a while back and got some very nasty emails from Chris Flood. That guy is a scumbag and anyone that does business with him should prepare for the worst.

By: Observant muthafucka

Observant muthafucka — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 04:15:47 +0000

The shit storm cometh!!!!

By: Jody

Jody — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:18:35 +0000

Dear “Right…”,

You have not received mail from me. I have not mailed other CL technicians for quite some time. Also, be aware that it is quite simple to forge another person’s address into your message. All that must be done is to change the “E-mail Address:” field in the mail program of choice temporarily and write the message. The SMTP server doesn’t check that stuff, so if you’re getting mail from me, feel free to forward it back to me so I can see what I supposedly said. I’ve been so busy working lately that I haven’t had time to repost my ad but maybe once a week if I’m lucky.

If I can’t even make it to CL to post my ad, why would I mail you at all? If someone attacks me on CL, I don’t even get to see it anymore, because quite frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck.

Jody

By: Right...

Right... — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:33:40 +0000

Pretty much every time Jody OR Chris gets attacked on CL, I and most techs on CL get strange calls, usually from anonymous callers, or harassing emails, often in which the communicator identifies himself as Jody or Chris (and usually the return email address, though not always, is their’s). Though the communications from Chris are foul and full of lies, while Jody’s are just irritating. I think anytime someone criticizes Chris, he assumes it’s Jody, and vice versa, even when it’s not. Bottom line: Both should just obey the rules, the laws, and practice some decency and common sense. Two big losers who can’t get hired anywhere else, frustrated by powerlessness, trying to “exert power” with mostly anonymous keyboard attacks. Pathetic.

By: Observant muthafucka

Observant muthafucka — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:25:07 +0000

One thing that is interesting is that when I correlate this page to activity in the Raleigh Craigslist Computer Services page or Chris Flood’s phone number page on 800notes.com, this page only sees NEW Jody-hater commentary appear when something anti-Chris Flood appears on either of the two previously mentioned web pages, even if it’s unclear if Jody is doing the negative posting, or even if it’s clear that he is *not* doing it. From this we can conclude that negative posts, especially the most recent ones, are Chris Flood posting anonymously as “revenge” for a perceived wrong, focusing on a concrete (Jody) instead of something he can’t as easily target and “defend against” (other anonymous people online).

The first time I noticed it, it may possibly have been pure coincidence. Coincidence of the same thing doesn’t usually happen twice in a row, much less three or more, and while coincidence does not necessarily imply correlation, more similar coincidence only supports the inference that it’s not really a coincidence at all, especially since we’re talking about three or more unrelated websites–unrelated except for Chris Flood’s involvement and attacks against Jody.

By: truly epic lulz

truly epic lulz — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:51:21 +0000

%3C%61%20%68%72%65%66%3D%22%23%22%3E%2E%2E%2E%3C%2F%61%3E%0A%3C%73%74%79%6C%65%20%74%79%70%65%3D%22%74%65%78%74%2F%63%73%73%22%3E%0A%2E%63%6F%6D%6D%65%6E%74%6C%69%73%74%20%6C%69%2C%20%23%63%6F%6D%6D%65%6E%74%66%6F%72%6D%20%69%6E%70%75%74%2C%20%23%63%6F%6D%6D%65%6E%74%66%6F%72%6D%20%74%65%78%74%61%72%65%61%20%7B%0A%09%63%6F%6C%6F%72%3A%20%23%66%66%66%66%66%66%20%3B%0A%09%7D%0A%3C%2F%73%74%79%6C%65%3E

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:31:30 +0000

I want to find the person that posted this cockshit on 4chan and punch them in the penis.

By: /b/tard.

/b/tard. — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:13:53 +0000

I have to agree with Reader’s Write above…the comments on this article are disgraceful and have no relevance to the article at all whatsoever…the comment tree should be pruned, this is not the place for the commission of silly personal attacks.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 23:53:30 +0000

Geez, I browse through here to dig up some DRM criticism articles as references for something, and look at this shit-storm I found. First off, “Huh?” forgot that everyone who visits a Registry has to agree not to use the material within to harass a registrant or face criminal charges. You can’t use “notifying the public” as an out, it doesn’t work that way. Harassment statutes (and now the new ones coming into play about cyberstalking) do _not_ have sex offender registry information exemptions codified into them. I can’t for example ride down to a courthouse, find that you have a felony conviction, and then run around the Internet telling everyone all about your felony criminal record and expect to just get away with it, citing “potential public danger.” Like it or not, sex offenders have the same rights granted to all other citizens, and that includes the equal protection of the law. You can’t use the fact that someone was convicted of breaking the law to then break the law yourself. Do you think that a jury will relieve you of responsibility just because the victim was an ex-convict? If you do, you’re delusional or power-mad, because that simply won’t happen. Two wrongs don’t make a right, and all it takes is the district attorney to get up there and tell the jury about your vigilantism to get you in deep doggie doo-doo.

As for Jody, considering how you seem to have appeared from nowhere on this page and started all the shit that then ensued, that makes you the instigator, and I say he has handled it fairly well. If he feels threatened enough to file a police report, so be it. Don’t under-estimate what one determined individual can do, and that goes for everyone here. That’s probably why the report was filed in the first place.

What does any of this shit have to do with digital rights restrictions? Not a damn thing. Jon should really delete all of these comments.

By: Aldi

Aldi — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:02:26 +0000

I feel that this is ridiculous. We must ask why the posters here are attacking this person in the first place. Why do we discuss the content of the attacks in the first place? The purpose behind the attacks is more interesting. That these people must attack in the first place is itself revealing and shows how level headed and professional such individuals are. I agree with the last statement by Irrelevant, it sums it up well: “Fuck ‘em.”

By: Alfredo

Alfredo — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:47:10 +0000

Wow. There are a lot of juvenile comments here. The whole fucking internet has been taken over by children or something. All of you just shut the fuck up and behave like adults, and everything will be great. I’ve never seen such fucking whining in my life!

By: Huh?

Huh? — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:02:12 +0000

STALKING YOU!? LOL! You make THREATS above! THREATS to inflict physical revenge! Let’s see, the State is going to charge someone with informing the public of information that the State requires the public to be informed of. Yeah, a jury will buy that. Wake up, Jodykins.

By: Irrelavant

Irrelavant — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:10:07 +0000

Jody, you bring so much of this on yourself with your “Internet Crusades” against, first (?) illegal immigrants, then those stupid “Eve Carson” attackers, and so on and on. You only make enemies with that, and draw attention to yourself, and make yourself more “searchable” on the Internet, and give more people more reason to search. Ever heard: People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones? Truly, your “crusades” have some good points, especially with regards to the “white flaunt lie/Eve Carson” thing. But you are OVERCOMPENSATING FOR WHAT YOU THINK OTHERS MAY THINK OF YOU. You’ll rest easier when you realize how little they do, except when you invite it. If someone were really out to get you they’d have told those “white flaunt” idiots about your record — they are basting you without even apparently knowing about that. Why don’t you work on the man in the mirror and quit trying to fight with everyone, even if you are sometimes right. Pick your battles. Work on your business — seems you are probably pretty good at it when you focus on THAT. You seem to get angrier by the week. Taking out your anger on whomever on the Internet (or filing police reports) will only get you more criticism, attention. And wastes your time and energy. Just be a good person and forget the naysayers and assholes. You’re letting them get to you. Courage: Grace Under Pressure. One man’s pressure is another’s “who gives a fuck”. And imagine what a person could do if they REALLY had it in for you, posting all over blogs and…EVERYWHERE, if they ended up charged with “stalking” you. They could easily have your name come up with a million hits from a hotspot no matter what the court did and no one could prove it was them. Be sensible, stay off the Internet mostly, and you’ll rest easier. Externalities no more generate stress than do potential stressors. It’s YOUR reactions, and actions, that generate this shit. Just be cool. Fuck ‘em.

By: Jody

Jody — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 02:56:44 +0000

OK, police report filed at the Carrboro Police Department. We’ll see how funny it is when you have to eat your fucking words for stalking me, asshole.

By: Jody

Jody — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:21:20 +0000

The person who posted that “megans law Chapel Hill” headered post is harassing all over the place. Trust me, I’m about to sue them. They won’t do it again.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:05:56 +0000

Dear “megans law Chapel Hill,”

You are incorrect. His easily accessible and insecure work computer allegedly contained illegal images. The case was plead out as these cases so often are, so the stuff that hit the media was never tried in a court of law and proven, therefore when you say what you’ve said, you are spreading information that you don’t actually know is true. That act is called “libel” and is illegal. You could get in a lot of shit for posting it.

By: megans law Chapel Hill

megans law Chapel Hill — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:55:15 +0000

He was dowloading Pornography of toddlers, infants, and pre-teens

that is sick