<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera 9 with BitTorrent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7846/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7846</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7846/comment-page-1#comment-33929</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-33929</guid>
		<description>Actually, Opera&#039;s the Swiss Army Knife of the internet and particularly handy if you&#039;re a developer, but hey - it&#039;s a question of taste.

Crap multi-functional items have features for features&#039; sake alone - and they deserve to be buried in the desert.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Opera&#8217;s the Swiss Army Knife of the internet and particularly handy if you&#8217;re a developer, but hey &#8211; it&#8217;s a question of taste.</p>
<p>Crap multi-functional items have features for features&#8217; sake alone &#8211; and they deserve to be buried in the desert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7846/comment-page-1#comment-33799</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 00:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-33799</guid>
		<description>I agree. The software design policy of &quot;do one thing and do it well&quot; always rings true to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. The software design policy of &#8220;do one thing and do it well&#8221; always rings true to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7846/comment-page-1#comment-33697</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 19:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-33697</guid>
		<description>Why should people use this, when dedicated BT clients, such as Azureus, always end up doing a better job? It&#039;s pretty obvious to everyone within P2P that multi-network P2P clients work like crap. Multi-purpose applications must be even worse... Mediocre implementation of BT...
And, Opera is proprietary. They lock up all their code so noone can change or improve upon it.
I say stick with what works, people. Azureus, KTorrent, Yet ABC and all the other dedicated BT clients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should people use this, when dedicated BT clients, such as Azureus, always end up doing a better job? It&#8217;s pretty obvious to everyone within P2P that multi-network P2P clients work like crap. Multi-purpose applications must be even worse&#8230; Mediocre implementation of BT&#8230;<br />
And, Opera is proprietary. They lock up all their code so noone can change or improve upon it.<br />
I say stick with what works, people. Azureus, KTorrent, Yet ABC and all the other dedicated BT clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


