Comments on: Did the RIAA try to con a court? http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7857 p2pnet.net - reader powered Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:45:22 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7857/comment-page-1#comment-33934 Reader's Write Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:22:49 +0000 #comment-33934 "Whitehead shot himself in the foot with his latest declaration," he told p2pnet. "He asserts that all Does are Gnutella users, directly contradicting earlier testimony, which included pages of Kazaa screenshots." This type of thing happens all the time because judges do not sancion lawyers who intentionally lie or are plain incopempetent in court. This lying and incompetency of lawyers and judges (who because they are lawyers have obvious sympathy for their fellow lawyers) seems to be going all of the time and is a major cause cause of the time and money that is wasted by all parties in the court system, along with fuzzy and poorly written laws and jurisprudence. As a result there is a totally corrupted, money driven legal system that has become just another business, a way to profit. The problem: No one is telling the people that the legal and court systems need a revolution, and the people keep on electing politicians that have no idea or act as if they have no idea of what goes on in the corrupted (USA) court system. Rafael Venegas http://www.gvenegas “Whitehead shot himself in the foot with his latest declaration,” he told p2pnet. “He asserts that all Does are Gnutella users, directly contradicting earlier testimony, which included pages of Kazaa screenshots.”

This type of thing happens all the time because judges do not sancion lawyers who intentionally lie or are plain incopempetent in court. This lying and incompetency of lawyers and judges (who because they are lawyers have obvious sympathy for their fellow lawyers) seems to be going all of the time and is a major cause cause of the time and money that is wasted by all parties in the court system, along with fuzzy and poorly written laws and jurisprudence. As a result there is a totally corrupted, money driven legal system that has become just another business, a way to profit.

The problem: No one is telling the people that the legal and court systems need a revolution, and the people keep on electing politicians that have no idea or act as if they have no idea of what goes on in the corrupted (USA) court system.

Rafael Venegas
http://www.gvenegas

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7857/comment-page-1#comment-33810 Reader's Write Thu, 09 Feb 2006 03:46:23 +0000 #comment-33810 As such they should be prosecuted under RICO Act, this is so blanted that mafia was never this blanted. As such they should be prosecuted under RICO Act, this is so blanted that mafia was never this blanted.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7857/comment-page-1#comment-33779 Reader's Write Wed, 08 Feb 2006 20:37:40 +0000 #comment-33779 I think the problem with these cases is quality of evidence. In other non-technical cases reliable evidence takes the form of dna, photographic and phone records. A screenshot is no where near this level of reliablity, neither are the RIAA's user logs, which i should mention are generated by the RIAA's business partners. Screenshots can be generated on a mass scale. How do we know the evidence is accurate? I suggest that any evidence the RIAA collects needs to be verifiied by an unbiased independent source. And these sources need to be present when the evidence is captured. I also suggest that the RIAA's technological methods need to be evaluated for quality of evidence. If fact i wouldn't even call this crap the RIAA is pushing as evidence, it's pure fabrication which does not prove a defendants guilt in any way. I think the problem with these cases is quality of evidence. In other non-technical cases reliable evidence takes the form of dna, photographic and phone records.

A screenshot is no where near this level of reliablity, neither are the RIAA’s user logs, which i should mention are generated by the RIAA’s business partners.

Screenshots can be generated on a mass scale. How do we know the evidence is accurate? I suggest that any evidence the RIAA collects needs to be verifiied by an unbiased independent source. And these sources need to be present when the evidence is captured. I also suggest that the RIAA’s technological methods need to be evaluated for quality of evidence.

If fact i wouldn’t even call this crap the RIAA is pushing as evidence, it’s pure fabrication which does not prove a defendants guilt in any way.

]]>