<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adsense, p2pnet and &#8216;fake clicks&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7896/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7896</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:43:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: seo digger</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7896/comment-page-1#comment-150836</link>
		<dc:creator>seo digger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 14:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-150836</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a real problem, man. Some of my friends have good sites which generate more than 5000 hosts per day and they often have letters from adsense support about invalid clicks. Fuck em, man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a real problem, man. Some of my friends have good sites which generate more than 5000 hosts per day and they often have letters from adsense support about invalid clicks. Fuck em, man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filesharing News Site p2pnet.net up for Sale &#124; TorrentFreak</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7896/comment-page-1#comment-150152</link>
		<dc:creator>Filesharing News Site p2pnet.net up for Sale &#124; TorrentFreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-150152</guid>
		<description>[...] And Google Adsense banned him for generating &#8220;spurious clicks&#8221; (aka cheating). He says he&#8217;s innocent, and we believe him, but Google won&#8217;t budge. They say they&#8217;re protecting their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And Google Adsense banned him for generating &#8220;spurious clicks&#8221; (aka cheating). He says he&#8217;s innocent, and we believe him, but Google won&#8217;t budge. They say they&#8217;re protecting their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7896/comment-page-1#comment-34276</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-34276</guid>
		<description>There is a script available to generate fkae clicks which appear to originate from a specific site,tested it on p2pnet - guess it works!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a script available to generate fkae clicks which appear to originate from a specific site,tested it on p2pnet &#8211; guess it works!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7896/comment-page-1#comment-34205</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-34205</guid>
		<description>This sounds way out, but does anyone think that the fact that MediaSentry sometimes watches this site have anything to do with this.

I say this about MediaSentry because with Peer Guardian I have been getting hit after hit when I come to this site. That is on two different computers in very different locations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds way out, but does anyone think that the fact that MediaSentry sometimes watches this site have anything to do with this.</p>
<p>I say this about MediaSentry because with Peer Guardian I have been getting hit after hit when I come to this site. That is on two different computers in very different locations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7896/comment-page-1#comment-34203</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-34203</guid>
		<description>Good job on informing the rest of us Jon. 

Sure, I agree with those that say, &quot;who cares? Fuck them. Get some other ad&quot; but I have to add that informing the others is more helpful than forgetting the whole thing. 

www.beatking.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job on informing the rest of us Jon. </p>
<p>Sure, I agree with those that say, &#8220;who cares? Fuck them. Get some other ad&#8221; but I have to add that informing the others is more helpful than forgetting the whole thing. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.beatking.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.beatking.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7896/comment-page-1#comment-34200</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-34200</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that when they made a public statment (on your own site no less) when attempting to use the google search, that P2P violated the ToS that would be grounds for a lawsuit for ungrounded slander or libel

definition
li·bel (l&#299;&#039;b&#601;l) 
n.
A false publication, as in writing, print, signs, or pictures, that damages a person&#039;s reputation.
The act of presenting such material to the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that when they made a public statment (on your own site no less) when attempting to use the google search, that P2P violated the ToS that would be grounds for a lawsuit for ungrounded slander or libel</p>
<p>definition<br />
li·bel (l&#299;&#8217;b&#601;l)<br />
n.<br />
A false publication, as in writing, print, signs, or pictures, that damages a person&#8217;s reputation.<br />
The act of presenting such material to the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7896/comment-page-1#comment-34180</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-34180</guid>
		<description>Have you noticed that you lost that account right about the time that google bowed before the wall of China?  You show on your China related stories how the Chineese people can circumnavigate the blocking that China does, google may have taken your account out because they did not want to offend their red leaders.  Just my humble opinion....  Gizmo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you noticed that you lost that account right about the time that google bowed before the wall of China?  You show on your China related stories how the Chineese people can circumnavigate the blocking that China does, google may have taken your account out because they did not want to offend their red leaders.  Just my humble opinion&#8230;.  Gizmo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7896/comment-page-1#comment-34125</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-34125</guid>
		<description>It isn&#039;t your fault

Thay don&#039;t agree with you, so must work for the RIAA. 

Internet Rule #17</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t your fault</p>
<p>Thay don&#8217;t agree with you, so must work for the RIAA. </p>
<p>Internet Rule #17</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7896/comment-page-1#comment-34104</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-34104</guid>
		<description>fuck &#039;em man- join adbrite:

http://www.adbrite.com/mb/?spid=8194&amp;afb=110_32_01</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fuck &#8216;em man- join adbrite:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.adbrite.com/mb/?spid=8194&#038;afb=110_32_01" rel="nofollow">http://www.adbrite.com/mb/?spid=8194&#038;afb=110_32_01</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7896/comment-page-1#comment-34103</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-34103</guid>
		<description>I think you are making far better sense here on this site about Google and their fake &quot;click fraud&quot; excuse to remove folks than you will ever get out of them. It isn&#039;t that they can&#039;t prove the case of falsity. They have the data to do so, they also know if they are wrong or not. It isn&#039;t about that and most likely never was. The blanket &quot;click fraud&quot; is the excuse to dump accounts that they feel are costing them money. 

They get better exposure from small sites that carry the same ads all over the place than one site with a large following. The small sites have a smaller price tag, simple economics. It&#039;s something they aren&#039;t going to put into writing else they don&#039;t have a way out. This is nothing but a blanket excuse to do the dirty work. Since they already have the data to prove or disprove it, it isn&#039;t a matter of lack of data. It&#039;s a matter of covering their tracks. Google has gotten the big business swelling of the pants. It shows not only in this issue of what they call click fraud but it shows in other places like China where they are quite willing to turn over someones data to do business. 

Less and less do I like to use Google. Items like this and like the Chinese involvement make this choice easier and easier. In other places I have sometimes some influance. I will be making sure my voice is heard over this matter of click fraud down the line. Damn I hate big brother!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are making far better sense here on this site about Google and their fake &#8220;click fraud&#8221; excuse to remove folks than you will ever get out of them. It isn&#8217;t that they can&#8217;t prove the case of falsity. They have the data to do so, they also know if they are wrong or not. It isn&#8217;t about that and most likely never was. The blanket &#8220;click fraud&#8221; is the excuse to dump accounts that they feel are costing them money. </p>
<p>They get better exposure from small sites that carry the same ads all over the place than one site with a large following. The small sites have a smaller price tag, simple economics. It&#8217;s something they aren&#8217;t going to put into writing else they don&#8217;t have a way out. This is nothing but a blanket excuse to do the dirty work. Since they already have the data to prove or disprove it, it isn&#8217;t a matter of lack of data. It&#8217;s a matter of covering their tracks. Google has gotten the big business swelling of the pants. It shows not only in this issue of what they call click fraud but it shows in other places like China where they are quite willing to turn over someones data to do business. </p>
<p>Less and less do I like to use Google. Items like this and like the Chinese involvement make this choice easier and easier. In other places I have sometimes some influance. I will be making sure my voice is heard over this matter of click fraud down the line. Damn I hate big brother!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7896/comment-page-1#comment-34094</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 08:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-34094</guid>
		<description>If they have not given you money you earned, sue them.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they have not given you money you earned, sue them&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7896/comment-page-1#comment-34084</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-34084</guid>
		<description>Your smacking your head against are brick wall bud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your smacking your head against are brick wall bud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7896/comment-page-1#comment-34080</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 03:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-34080</guid>
		<description>i wouldn&#039;t hold your breath either</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wouldn&#8217;t hold your breath either</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
