<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BREIN closes 16 Dutch sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7898/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7898</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7898/comment-page-1#comment-34153</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 03:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-34153</guid>
		<description>&quot;BREIN is also demanding personal data on site employees...&quot;

Sounds to me like they are trying to say employees=job. In otherwords if you work a job the reflection of job is that you make money to do so. Yet another spin as most sites I know of don&#039;t pay. 

Again the only hold they have to make things stick is if they can prove profit. (oh, there&#039;s infringement to be certain but it is beginning to look more and more like that profit motive is the strong point.) Without hooking to &quot;for profit&quot; their cases are far weaker. Even the &quot;for profit&quot; is fairly weak if you actually look at the money they are talking about. Crap most true pirates that copy and sell would make more money than a website. The majority of websites I know of just make enough to pay the bills if they are lucky. 

I notice that strangely missing is the names of the other sites. It looks like they went after &quot;splash value&quot; here. They named two larger sites, what about the others? I suspect they don&#039;t have the same value and are collateral damage rather than actual prime targets. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;BREIN is also demanding personal data on site employees&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds to me like they are trying to say employees=job. In otherwords if you work a job the reflection of job is that you make money to do so. Yet another spin as most sites I know of don&#8217;t pay. </p>
<p>Again the only hold they have to make things stick is if they can prove profit. (oh, there&#8217;s infringement to be certain but it is beginning to look more and more like that profit motive is the strong point.) Without hooking to &#8220;for profit&#8221; their cases are far weaker. Even the &#8220;for profit&#8221; is fairly weak if you actually look at the money they are talking about. Crap most true pirates that copy and sell would make more money than a website. The majority of websites I know of just make enough to pay the bills if they are lucky. </p>
<p>I notice that strangely missing is the names of the other sites. It looks like they went after &#8220;splash value&#8221; here. They named two larger sites, what about the others? I suspect they don&#8217;t have the same value and are collateral damage rather than actual prime targets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


