Comments on: Australian Kazaa case rolls on

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 07:09:13 +0000

Spelling wrong, facts spot on your honour.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 06:53:46 +0000

No that would be, “spelling wrong”, “Facts correct”. It must be hard for you to admit that even your poster child despises Sharman, Kazaa and crew. She is a victim of Sharman as well as the RIAA machine. Lets call it for what it is. Copyright infringement is not a victimless crime. Lets not waste time on semantics. All creations return to their creator, its the law of Karma. Ignorance is no defence.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 04:56:44 +0000

Given that Judge Wilcox took six months to announce his judgement, a quick ruling is extremely unlikey in this latests Sharman appeal. There will be no slithering out of cross examination by Nikki Hemming, she could very well end in prison if she lies to the court. There will be no hiding behind some high paid Lawyer. They pulverised the CTO Phil Morle. She is in deep, deep shit. She may well spend her 40th birthday Jan 2007 as a convict or the truth of the whole Kazaa, Sharman, Altnet,Jolted,Vanuata trust scam wil be revealed . Australian courts dont take kindly to being lied to. That deep shit that your gagging on Nik is your own, liar liar pants on fire!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:14:45 +0000

or they may end up with nothing because they did nothing to prevent people from sharing music other than line the pockets of politicians and lawyers. It is highly likely that the need for damages will be directly related to the size of the explanation the record company lawyers need to give to justify the artists dollars spent on this case

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:48:38 +0000

… The Recording industry may very well land massive damages claims taking all of the above into account … or will they shoot themselves in the foot again?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:34:08 +0000

That would be Mrs. Patti Santangelo. Her picture has graced the lead story on p2pnet for several weeks now.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:29:31 +0000

There was no finding of guilt…that is a LIE…this was a civil case as painful as it might be to the record industry’s lawyers they lost most of their case and probably are running the appeal to get over the embarrasment of that if anyone at a record comapny had the smarts to ask why ten million dollars was spent losing so much

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 06:55:33 +0000

You failed to mention that via Sharman networks Hemming, Bermeister and the hidden ones they are protecting are appealing the entire guilty verdict. Also the three Judges will be handling the contempt of court issue of Hemming and co for ignoring the filtering court orders. On top of that Nikki Hemming has a seat booked for herself in the same Federal court,in early march 06 where she will be cross examined by the music industry. Just a few facts that the above article ignored. Nikki Hemming will either have to lie under oath or reveal the trail that leads to Mark Dyne, the Skype duo and the cash from the Skype sale. The Recording industry may very well land massive damages claims taking all of the above into account. The above article looks like it was written by Sharman Networks or Hemming herself. Even Patti Santiago noted her main issue is with Sharman Networks for allowing children to download pirated music.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 02:16:51 +0000

Of course the record companies lost part of the case. Who appeals a victory???

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 01:10:59 +0000

It was never made clear that the record companies lost so much of the case. You have to wonder why they were so dishonest about it all?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:18:55 +0000

Duh! P2Pnet.net…all of u news reporters are so slow to the news?

Whats that mean? There is a new court case in the Los Angeles against Kazaa!! Look all you slycks and zeros and slashdots….

Knock Knock, whos there? Skype, Skype who? I couldnt eskype ur lawsuit…

Phones it in..