Comments on: Patti Santangelo pushes back http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7996 p2pnet.net - reader powered Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:27:55 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7996/comment-page-1#comment-34662 Reader's Write Thu, 23 Feb 2006 02:37:12 +0000 #comment-34662 "That said, Patti objected to 18 of certain of their discovery demands (called "Requests for Admissions"). The Court didn't rule on one of them, upheld 11, and directed that we answer the other six (how to answer them wasn't before the Court, only whether they had to be answered at all)." Of 18 demands, 11 were upheld by the court, 6 are answerable on order of the court and only 1 was not ruled on at all - how can that be good? “That said, Patti objected to 18 of certain of their discovery demands (called “Requests for Admissions”). The Court didn’t rule on one of them, upheld 11, and directed that we answer the other six (how to answer them wasn’t before the Court, only whether they had to be answered at all).”

Of 18 demands, 11 were upheld by the court, 6 are answerable on order of the court and only 1 was not ruled on at all – how can that be good?

]]>