Canadian school bans Wi-Fi
p2p news / p2pnet: A Canadian university has ruled against Wi-Fi on the campus because administrators are worried about possible hazards to student health.
Lakehead is located at the head of Lake Superior in Thunder Bay, Ontario, and president Fred Gilbert won’t allow Wi-Fi, "until he’s satisfied EMF (electric and magnetic fields) exposure doesn’t pose a health risk, particularly to young people," says ITBusiness.ca.
The story has Gilbert saying he based his decision on scientific literature that indicates the potential for "some fairly significant" health consequences.
"These are particularly relevant in younger people (who have) fast-growing tissues, and most of our student body are late teenagers and still growing, so it’s just a matter of taking precautions and providing an environment that doesn’t have a potential risk associated risk," he said.
In addition, Canadian regulation allows for a higher minimum degree of exposure to EMFs than do some other countries, he states, adding, according to ITBusiness.ca:
"All I’m saying is while the jury’s out on this one, I’m not going to put in place what is potential chronic exposure for our students. Admittedly that’s highest around the locations of the antenna sites and the wireless hotspots, but those are the places people tend to gravitate to because they get the best reception."
(Thanks, Jools)
Also See:
ITBusiness.ca - Health concerns limit wireless Internet at Lakehead University, January 23, 2006





p2pnet - rss feed: 
February 22nd, 2006 at 9:00 pm
that is really stupid
February 22nd, 2006 at 11:00 pm
Better stop letting all those students hold microwave transmitters up to their heads!
February 23rd, 2006 at 2:12 am
Radios/microwave ovens/even stoves. Did you know that any heat emitting material emits electromagnetic waves? In fact, your neurons are a source of em waves. Should shut down those too.
February 23rd, 2006 at 3:00 am
The only hot spot he will find that causes problems… his asshole.
February 23rd, 2006 at 4:07 am
this guy is a nut case… so i wonder if he wears a tin foil on his head to keep it clear……
February 23rd, 2006 at 4:28 am
Now i actually live in thunder bay and my dad’s a proffessor at the univercity and even he thinks its retarded. They just started having internet courses taught there and they keep crashing and shit cause of faulty programming. Also alot of classes who use internet are being put at a huge disadvantage. The president is what most refer to as an idiot. He turned down basically 120 000 dollars from 2 profs trying to get time off to work on a project that they require to travel for 3 years for and recieved the biggest grant any proffessor at lakehead ever got in the social science department. He also plays hockey and starts alot of fights.
Point is when your “scientific facts” are written by stupid people who probably didn’t prove it properly you put students at a disadvantage
February 23rd, 2006 at 5:41 am
Absolutely Silly.
February 23rd, 2006 at 5:55 am
Yeah, Fred Gilbert is quite possibly the most despised person in the Thunder Bay education system - hell, maybe even Ontario.
And not just because of this, this is minimal to the kind of shit he tries to pull without getting any input from the student body, faculty, or even City Hall.
Here’s some articles from our local paper:
http://66.244.236.251/article_4275.php
http://66.244.236.251/article_4123.php
Fred Gilbert is a perfect example of an ‘educated’ asshole. Educated in the sense that he knows how to play the system, not that he has any sense of logic.
February 23rd, 2006 at 1:14 pm
dear mr. gilbert,
i receive information from ‘ile sans fil’. would you mind contacting them in order to understand about the dangers of ‘wireless connections’.
www.ilesansfil.org
you can contact me at - spiritofcamden@london.com
i shall read any emails you send to me via my wirelessly connected laptop.
yours sincerely
robin swan
February 23rd, 2006 at 1:30 pm
dear forum administrator,
before i posted a comment i observed the reference ‘anonymous coward’ .
?
i am robin swan and i live in london.
do you need to know anymore about me?
why should anonymity be an issue? is it because you get reactionary types writing obscenities?
i suppose it’s controversy that newspapers rely on.
where would a newspaper be without people being outragious.
mr.gilbert, is he outragious?
February 23rd, 2006 at 3:37 pm
wow…
maybe he should leave the physics and health of em waves to the physics and medical profession instead of just making things up off the top of his head.
all matter emits em waves at different frequencies…just because some frequencies may be bad for the human body, doesn’t mean they all are.
so sick of these uneducated assholes who manage to get high up in organizations, running things by the skin of their balls
February 24th, 2006 at 4:39 pm
Finally, a school administrator who actually cares about their students! Fred Gilbert is 100% on the money. There’s plenty of internet access currently available to the students at Lakeland and this Wi-fi decision does not affect the quality of education at Lakeland in *any way*. I challenge anyone to prove otherwise. If the quality of education is not your focus then you’ve been watching too much TV, this is a school we’re talking about here. Not a mall, not a Starbucks, not an airport . A school.
Fred Gilbert is protecting our children from a potential risk. I only wish school admins had been this diligent back when Coca-Cola was packing our grade schools full of Coke machines.
Looking back in retrospect 20 years from now Fred Gilbert will be seen as a hero. The risks from Wi-fi are woefully understudied and understated. The studies which do exist are primarily industry shills. Three cheers for Fred Gilbert, thanks for doing the right thing Fred! It’s a lonely road when you do the right thing, and I have nothing but respect for the person who knows that and does it anyhow.
February 27th, 2006 at 10:19 am
Wow - it’s amazing that an educational establishment can missappropriate science so badly. WiFi transmits at less than one-quarter of a watt of power. This is infintessimally small compared to a cell-phone and you hold that to your head!
You get more EMF radiation from the back of a TV, a leaking microwave, or a power transformer.
Such an education policy belongs to the dark ages and alchemy. Quick, turn off the power to the school, the EMF is killing our children.
February 28th, 2006 at 12:54 pm
why are americans so bothered yet resolve nothing. i am observing polemical diatribe. whats all this romantisism about ‘lonely roads’. the issue is not about a test of will. the issue resides clearly with this question. is ‘fred gilbert’ informed about ‘wi-fi’ or not?
i suggest you consult with an ‘expert’ not a ‘luddite’
robin, london (i’m not anonymous)
spiritofcamden@london.com
November 4th, 2008 at 1:44 pm
I copied the following comment from the BioElectric Shield newsletter for 11/08.
Doctor Notes-Comment from Dr. Charles Brown, DC, DABCN, Chiropractic Neurologist and Inventor of the Shield
The dangers of EMF are no longer a debatable issue. This is just one in a growing number of studies showing that cell phone usage is even more risky for your children and young people. We can only imagine at this point the negative effects of using a cell phone over 30 or 40 years or more. Over the past 20 years the situation has grown substantially worse, year by year. To protect yourself and your children, action is needed.
Rather than take a chance, it is prudent to protect yourself and your family. Wearing a BioElectric Shield will protect not only from the cell phone you are using, but also from the EMF from everything else around you: cell towers, televisions, microwave and other advanced technologies.
This situation is of enough concern that we recommend a multi-level approach is warranted. Take no chances with your health and that of your family. Our first and strongest suggestion is to wear a Shield and make sure all family members are wearing them as well. If your children are too young to responsibly wear one without using it, you can hang it over their bed at night. It will blend with their energy field while they are sleeping and and secondarily, also either get a BioPro cell phone chip. Or you can get an Aulterra Cell Phone Neutralizer which will work on your cell phone and any other radiation emitting device, like a portable phone, remote control, computer, etc. BioPro also make Universal Chips that can be placed on the same devices.
www.bioelectricshield.com
Personally I’ve worn a Shield since 1994 and don’t go a day without it. CN