Comments on: Anti-AOL ‘email tax’ demo

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:02:14 +0000

As if AOL didn’t have enough money….How about paying off a security official (bad example) to let illegal aliens in?
OR: paying the police to allow a pedophile into your childs grade school whenever they want to go there. (good example)
OR: Paying to have “Scholastic News” or “The Christian Science Monitor” print ads for drug dealers and escort services without their permission.

jeffrok4@msn.com

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:38:58 +0000

I’m for it.

People will either run to AOL to get away from Spam or will run away from AOL because the service has degraded.

This is a good free market device.

It might even bury a few spam makers because they suddenly lose access to millions of e-mail adddresses.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 25 Feb 2006 00:31:42 +0000

So will people be able to delete these messages from their inboxes without reading them? I summarilly delete spam if I don’t recongize the sender or the subject, without viewing it.