DoJ answers Google
p2p news / p2pnet: An 18-page US Department of Justice brief argues Google’s objections to Cheney / Bush administration demands, "to examine millions of its users’ Internet search requests would violate privacy rights," are unwarranted, says the Associated Press.
"The brief was the Justice Department’s reply to arguments filed by Google last week," says the story. "Google has rebuffed the government’s demand to review a week of its search requests."
The Cheney / Bush administration is using the hoary Hollywood pornography stand-by as an excuse to mine the Google material.
"The department believes that the information will help revive an online child protection law that the Supreme Court has blocked," says AP. "By showing the wide variety of Web sites that people find through search engines, the government hopes to prove that Internet filters are not strong enough to prevent children from viewing pornography and other inappropriate material online."
"The filing included a declaration by Philip B. Stark, a statistics professor at the University of California, Berkeley, who rejected the privacy concerns, noting the government specifically requested that Google remove any identifying information."
Google’s concerns are as likely to centre on bad the PR that would be generated if it handed the data over, and which in turn might impact advertising, as they are on user privacy issues.
Also See:
Associated Press – Justice Department responds to Google’s privacy concerns, February 25, 2006





March 2nd, 2006 at 12:55 pm
If push comes to shove, Google should do the following:
Purchase 12,000 reams of really crappy copy paper.
Purchase several dozen really crappy (but fast) cheap laser printers.
Print out all of the information the Government wants in single-spaced 6 pt Helvetica Ultra Condensed (double sided).
Pack it all back in the paper boxes in loose sheets.
Load it in a truck.
Drive it to Washington DC
Dump it on the loading dock of the DoJ building.
Have the receiving clerk sign for it as evidence of compliance with subpoena.
Go have lunch at Annie’s Steak House.
Get back in truck and laugh hysterically all of the way back to silicon valley.
–TurboGeek