<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: France quashes DRM ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8064/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8064</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8064/comment-page-1#comment-35548</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 20:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-35548</guid>
		<description>This story has been widely misreported as indicating that the French court banned DVD copying. Not at all - they merely backed off from the position that the DVD suppliers are obligated to make copying possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story has been widely misreported as indicating that the French court banned DVD copying. Not at all &#8211; they merely backed off from the position that the DVD suppliers are obligated to make copying possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8064/comment-page-1#comment-35519</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 20:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-35519</guid>
		<description>Thi story illustrates how laws are not understandable.

A citizen does an act and a court says it is ok.
Then another court contradicts the judge.

The question: How was the citizen to know at the beginning how to interpret the law?

Now the next citizen, to interpret the law must read the jurisprudence of the two courts! And as jurisprudence builds, so does the confusion grow.

This is why a downlowader or copier of a CD can never know if the use of what he/she is sold is legal and wether he/she may be a criminal doing jail time.

Yes...
Bastards designed the legal system. While the people twiddle and suck their thumbs. In France and elsewhere.

Rafael Venegas
http://www.gvenegas.com

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thi story illustrates how laws are not understandable.</p>
<p>A citizen does an act and a court says it is ok.<br />
Then another court contradicts the judge.</p>
<p>The question: How was the citizen to know at the beginning how to interpret the law?</p>
<p>Now the next citizen, to interpret the law must read the jurisprudence of the two courts! And as jurisprudence builds, so does the confusion grow.</p>
<p>This is why a downlowader or copier of a CD can never know if the use of what he/she is sold is legal and wether he/she may be a criminal doing jail time.</p>
<p>Yes&#8230;<br />
Bastards designed the legal system. While the people twiddle and suck their thumbs. In France and elsewhere.</p>
<p>Rafael Venegas<br />
<a href="http://www.gvenegas.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gvenegas.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


