<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Napster blames woes on Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8075/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8075</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8075/comment-page-1#comment-35583</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 03:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-35583</guid>
		<description>Sssssssshhhhh.... there are bloodthirsty Apple fanboi&#039;s around here that think Fairplay is their god and Apple can never do any wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sssssssshhhhh&#8230;. there are bloodthirsty Apple fanboi&#8217;s around here that think Fairplay is their god and Apple can never do any wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8075/comment-page-1#comment-35545</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 14:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-35545</guid>
		<description>Shock Horror! PlaysForSure doesn&#039;t play for sure.

In other news, Fairplay doesn&#039;t play fair.

Just Say No TO DRM, m&#039;kay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shock Horror! PlaysForSure doesn&#8217;t play for sure.</p>
<p>In other news, Fairplay doesn&#8217;t play fair.</p>
<p>Just Say No TO DRM, m&#8217;kay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8075/comment-page-1#comment-35533</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 03:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-35533</guid>
		<description>Just caught one of the RIAA&#039;s puff pieces on our local news a couple of days ago when some local people became part of the latest round of lawsuits. Listening to it was just like reading one of the RIAA&#039;s press releases. &quot;Filesharing is illegal&quot;, &quot;Be safe and go to Music United dot org&#039;s website where there is a list of &quot;legal&quot; places to get your music&quot;, &quot;blah, blah, blah&quot;, &quot;etc, etc, etc&quot;. It pissed me off enough after seeing the completely biased segment that I took the time to write and send this email to the reporter:

Subj: Regarding Tuesdays RIAA segment...  
To: kwainscott@TheMilwaukeeChannel.com 


Hi, Kent.
Just had to comment on this. While it&#039;s good to see some mainstream news coverage of this situation, it would be even better if you did some research on the situation instead of just pushing the RIAA&#039;s latest PR puff piece.
Could you pleae explain to me what &quot;illegal&quot; music is or what an &quot;illegal&quot; download is?? Let me rephrase that... Do you understand the difference between criminal and civil matters?? Copyriight infringement is a civil matter between the infringer and the copyright holder. These are not criminal cases before a criminal court, therefore the word &quot;illegal&quot; does not apply no matter how much the RIAA wants it to. Copyright infringement does not equal theft, as the industry would like everyone to believe. The Supreme court made this clear in it&#039;s decision 21 years ago when ruling on the Dowling vs. United States case.
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=11662

Here&#039;s some links to provide more insight as to what&#039;s REALLY happening in the world outside of RIAA dreamland...
http://www.p2pnet.net/index.php
http://www.slyck.com/
Add these to your favorites and check them daily and you will see what a travesty and a crock all this really is. The industry feels it must destroy everything it cannot control, but this time it&#039;s too late. They missed the boat as they tried to hang on to an outdated business model and they will suffer to their grave. If they invested even half of the money they&#039;re wasting on DRM and the extortion campaign into better product and artists, and treated their customers with respect instead of labeling them all &quot;criminals&quot;, they wouldn&#039;t have so many problems as they do now. I, personally, don&#039;t want anything they have to offer, even for free. The independent labels have much more to offer... better music and better artists, AND they embrace technology rather than try to fight it and destroy it. The RIAA dinosaurs are dying, and deservedly so, because of their inabilty to adapt. The porn industry is thriving like never before despite free downloading. Why is this? Because they know how to adapt and capitalize on every piece of new technology that comes along.
I hope to see this topic again without such a biased view, but then I&#039;ve come to expect it. After all, they are the one&#039;s who sign YOUR check every week too, aren&#039;t they? Not the RIAA, but the MPAA/Disney who ultimately owns your station, and who are engaged in the same despicable behavior. I&#039;ll bet Walt is turning in his grave as he sees all these children being sued by the industry he loved so much and invested his life into.
OK, my rant is over,
XXX

As expected, there was no response.

Should anyone want to copy this and use it themselves, feel free:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just caught one of the RIAA&#8217;s puff pieces on our local news a couple of days ago when some local people became part of the latest round of lawsuits. Listening to it was just like reading one of the RIAA&#8217;s press releases. &#8220;Filesharing is illegal&#8221;, &#8220;Be safe and go to Music United dot org&#8217;s website where there is a list of &#8220;legal&#8221; places to get your music&#8221;, &#8220;blah, blah, blah&#8221;, &#8220;etc, etc, etc&#8221;. It pissed me off enough after seeing the completely biased segment that I took the time to write and send this email to the reporter:</p>
<p>Subj: Regarding Tuesdays RIAA segment&#8230;<br />
To: <a href="mailto:kwainscott@TheMilwaukeeChannel.com">kwainscott@TheMilwaukeeChannel.com</a> </p>
<p>Hi, Kent.<br />
Just had to comment on this. While it&#8217;s good to see some mainstream news coverage of this situation, it would be even better if you did some research on the situation instead of just pushing the RIAA&#8217;s latest PR puff piece.<br />
Could you pleae explain to me what &#8220;illegal&#8221; music is or what an &#8220;illegal&#8221; download is?? Let me rephrase that&#8230; Do you understand the difference between criminal and civil matters?? Copyriight infringement is a civil matter between the infringer and the copyright holder. These are not criminal cases before a criminal court, therefore the word &#8220;illegal&#8221; does not apply no matter how much the RIAA wants it to. Copyright infringement does not equal theft, as the industry would like everyone to believe. The Supreme court made this clear in it&#8217;s decision 21 years ago when ruling on the Dowling vs. United States case.<br />
<a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=11662" rel="nofollow">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=11662</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s some links to provide more insight as to what&#8217;s REALLY happening in the world outside of RIAA dreamland&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.p2pnet.net/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.p2pnet.net/index.php</a><br />
<a href="http://www.slyck.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.slyck.com/</a><br />
Add these to your favorites and check them daily and you will see what a travesty and a crock all this really is. The industry feels it must destroy everything it cannot control, but this time it&#8217;s too late. They missed the boat as they tried to hang on to an outdated business model and they will suffer to their grave. If they invested even half of the money they&#8217;re wasting on DRM and the extortion campaign into better product and artists, and treated their customers with respect instead of labeling them all &#8220;criminals&#8221;, they wouldn&#8217;t have so many problems as they do now. I, personally, don&#8217;t want anything they have to offer, even for free. The independent labels have much more to offer&#8230; better music and better artists, AND they embrace technology rather than try to fight it and destroy it. The RIAA dinosaurs are dying, and deservedly so, because of their inabilty to adapt. The porn industry is thriving like never before despite free downloading. Why is this? Because they know how to adapt and capitalize on every piece of new technology that comes along.<br />
I hope to see this topic again without such a biased view, but then I&#8217;ve come to expect it. After all, they are the one&#8217;s who sign YOUR check every week too, aren&#8217;t they? Not the RIAA, but the MPAA/Disney who ultimately owns your station, and who are engaged in the same despicable behavior. I&#8217;ll bet Walt is turning in his grave as he sees all these children being sued by the industry he loved so much and invested his life into.<br />
OK, my rant is over,<br />
XXX</p>
<p>As expected, there was no response.</p>
<p>Should anyone want to copy this and use it themselves, feel free:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


