<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bizarre uTorrent, PeerFactor deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8097/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8097</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8097/comment-page-1#comment-36038</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 00:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-36038</guid>
		<description>Why exactly is that? Is that your opinion maybe because you have little understanding of how bittorrent works?

Please explain to me why this is such suspicious behavior. What is it you think is a possible effect on bittorrent or even the utorrent client?

Nada. Zip. Zero. None. You can&#039;t show me one thing possibly adversely affected, besides possibly Strigeus&#039; standing in the community for &quot;dealing with the enemy&quot;.

People need to realize that even p2p idols need to eat. 
It would be so refreshing to see someone actually do their research before offhandedly condemning last week&#039;s hero as this week&#039;s traitor.
note: these remarks are directed at this readers write imbecile, not p2pnet. Keep up the good work Jon and crew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why exactly is that? Is that your opinion maybe because you have little understanding of how bittorrent works?</p>
<p>Please explain to me why this is such suspicious behavior. What is it you think is a possible effect on bittorrent or even the utorrent client?</p>
<p>Nada. Zip. Zero. None. You can&#8217;t show me one thing possibly adversely affected, besides possibly Strigeus&#8217; standing in the community for &#8220;dealing with the enemy&#8221;.</p>
<p>People need to realize that even p2p idols need to eat.<br />
It would be so refreshing to see someone actually do their research before offhandedly condemning last week&#8217;s hero as this week&#8217;s traitor.<br />
note: these remarks are directed at this readers write imbecile, not p2pnet. Keep up the good work Jon and crew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8097/comment-page-1#comment-35916</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 23:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-35916</guid>
		<description>This article is one of the reasons people are jumping to conclusions.
     First of all the deal is not with UTorrent but with its developer.
     Secondly PeerFactor is no longer part of Retspan, the parted ways 6 months ago.
     Thirdly The only thing that Ludde has sold is a .dll file, not UTorrent or any of its code.
     Ludde has stated that absolutly nothing in UT will change other than further upgrades.

Quote

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 1:12 pm    Post subject: 	 	
Hi, 

I&#039;m not a hard core P2P-fan that&#039;s constantly at war with media companies. But I do like unrestricted file sharing, otherwise I wouldn&#039;t have made ÂµTorrent. 

I&#039;m also not at all a fan of RIAA or companies trying to limit the user&#039;s right to do stuff on his/her computer, and I hate the practises of limiting file sharing. (Encryption was implemented for a reason). 

File sharing is here to stay, both for file sharers that like to download illegal content, and by file sharing companies to promote legal content. Why am I not allowed to use my expertise to help companies distribute content over BitTorrent? 

I&#039;m netural, and not on anyone&#039;s side. I&#039;m working with file sharers using it for illegal purposes, and I&#039;m working with companies trying to give BitTorrent a better name. 

I&#039;m however not putting my hands on anything that would limit the effectiveness of BitTorrent, or reduce the ability for people to use it for whatever purpose they like. 

If the recent deal with PeerFactor turns out to be about limiting file sharing, or making it harder for pirates in any possible or imaginable way, then I will terminate our agreement promtly and concisely. 

/Ludvig

End Quote.

     So I think that the reporters should do a little better investigating before posting and spreding untrue and misleading information. Get it together guys we look to you for truth not hearsay.

Regards;
                Guynewbie


     </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is one of the reasons people are jumping to conclusions.<br />
     First of all the deal is not with UTorrent but with its developer.<br />
     Secondly PeerFactor is no longer part of Retspan, the parted ways 6 months ago.<br />
     Thirdly The only thing that Ludde has sold is a .dll file, not UTorrent or any of its code.<br />
     Ludde has stated that absolutly nothing in UT will change other than further upgrades.</p>
<p>Quote</p>
<p>Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 1:12 pm    Post subject:<br />
Hi, </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a hard core P2P-fan that&#8217;s constantly at war with media companies. But I do like unrestricted file sharing, otherwise I wouldn&#8217;t have made ÂµTorrent. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also not at all a fan of RIAA or companies trying to limit the user&#8217;s right to do stuff on his/her computer, and I hate the practises of limiting file sharing. (Encryption was implemented for a reason). </p>
<p>File sharing is here to stay, both for file sharers that like to download illegal content, and by file sharing companies to promote legal content. Why am I not allowed to use my expertise to help companies distribute content over BitTorrent? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m netural, and not on anyone&#8217;s side. I&#8217;m working with file sharers using it for illegal purposes, and I&#8217;m working with companies trying to give BitTorrent a better name. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m however not putting my hands on anything that would limit the effectiveness of BitTorrent, or reduce the ability for people to use it for whatever purpose they like. </p>
<p>If the recent deal with PeerFactor turns out to be about limiting file sharing, or making it harder for pirates in any possible or imaginable way, then I will terminate our agreement promtly and concisely. </p>
<p>/Ludvig</p>
<p>End Quote.</p>
<p>     So I think that the reporters should do a little better investigating before posting and spreding untrue and misleading information. Get it together guys we look to you for truth not hearsay.</p>
<p>Regards;<br />
                Guynewbie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8097/comment-page-1#comment-35858</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-35858</guid>
		<description>Try ABC, yet another bittorent client.. its still opensourced, but it isnt being updated as often as i would prefer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try ABC, yet another bittorent client.. its still opensourced, but it isnt being updated as often as i would prefer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8097/comment-page-1#comment-35776</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 15:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-35776</guid>
		<description>that says it all to me:
http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=160920#p160920


(12:43:20) (@segosa) so, since you didn&#039;t answer in the thread, did you really have no clue about them before you signed, ludde?
(12:44:35) (~ludde) I knew that they had done some anti p2p, but I didn&#039;t think it was such a big deal.
(12:44:48) (~ludde) and the stuff I was involved it wasn&#039;t related to that anyway.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that says it all to me:<br />
<a href="http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=160920#p160920" rel="nofollow">http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=160920#p160920</a></p>
<p>(12:43:20) (@segosa) so, since you didn&#8217;t answer in the thread, did you really have no clue about them before you signed, ludde?<br />
(12:44:35) (~ludde) I knew that they had done some anti p2p, but I didn&#8217;t think it was such a big deal.<br />
(12:44:48) (~ludde) and the stuff I was involved it wasn&#8217;t related to that anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8097/comment-page-1#comment-35723</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 08:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-35723</guid>
		<description>Bitcomet to the rescue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bitcomet to the rescue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8097/comment-page-1#comment-35696</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 03:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-35696</guid>
		<description>Ah crap. And just as I was gettug used-to a low-mem P2P app. Azureus seems to take up around 15 (?) times-plus more mem than uTorrent; anything else out there which draws low-mem and _hasn&#039;t_ sold out (as has Bram?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah crap. And just as I was gettug used-to a low-mem P2P app. Azureus seems to take up around 15 (?) times-plus more mem than uTorrent; anything else out there which draws low-mem and _hasn&#8217;t_ sold out (as has Bram?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8097/comment-page-1#comment-35693</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 01:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-35693</guid>
		<description>Discussed at great length on slyck.com.  Summary:

1. Can&#039;t trust uTorrent anymore
2. No, uTorrent is great, don&#039;t worry
3. Developer sold out
4. You hypocrite, stealing files and criticizing others
5. It&#039;s a scam like Loki Torrent
6. Wait and see
7. What kind of deal is it?
...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discussed at great length on slyck.com.  Summary:</p>
<p>1. Can&#8217;t trust uTorrent anymore<br />
2. No, uTorrent is great, don&#8217;t worry<br />
3. Developer sold out<br />
4. You hypocrite, stealing files and criticizing others<br />
5. It&#8217;s a scam like Loki Torrent<br />
6. Wait and see<br />
7. What kind of deal is it?<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8097/comment-page-1#comment-35691</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-35691</guid>
		<description>uTorrent is dead, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uTorrent is dead, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


