Comments on: The Return of .XXX? http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8248 p2pnet.net - reader powered Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:36:32 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8248/comment-page-1#comment-36322 Reader's Write Tue, 21 Mar 2006 02:51:41 +0000 #comment-36322 'cause you simply can't police it. If I was a webmaster running a porn site, I wouln't want kids looking at it because they can buy anything. ’cause you simply can’t police it.

If I was a webmaster running a porn site, I wouln’t want kids looking at it because they can buy anything.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8248/comment-page-1#comment-36312 Reader's Write Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:31:38 +0000 #comment-36312 Ok, I've stopped laughing. Exactly who is going to be a .xxx judge sending a citation to a site author either to remove, to .xxx naming, their mating actions and/or equipment OR have their plug pulled? Would it not be better to create a .cop (clean of porn) instead so folks could clearly show they are NOT broadcasting crap. By the way, speaking of broadcasting: If over a WI-FI you are sending porn doesn't this have anything to do with the FCC? www.allcleanhere.cop Ok, I’ve stopped laughing. Exactly who is going to be a .xxx judge sending a citation to a site author either to remove, to .xxx naming, their mating actions and/or equipment OR have their plug pulled?

Would it not be better to create a .cop (clean of porn) instead so folks could clearly show they are NOT broadcasting crap.

By the way, speaking of broadcasting:

If over a WI-FI you are sending porn doesn’t this have anything to do with the FCC?

http://www.allcleanhere.cop

]]>