Comments on: The impertinent Michael Geist

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:05:16 +0000

and when they cant defend themselves logically they turn to personal comments… wish there were more impertinent and presumptuous people out there like you

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 23 Mar 2006 04:06:40 +0000

and now they have to shit on you or they won’t get any more work from CRIA.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:31:29 +0000

It usually means that when you conduct research that is to be presented to policy makers, you remain impartial in your questioning as well as the results.

Survey says: Pollara may not be in business for very long.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:15:40 +0000

“So much for credibility…”

what is that? I haven’t seen in such a long time that I have forgotten what it was.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:57:55 +0000

That’s exactly what they did. Either they or their client didn’t properly analyze the results before releasing them or they were all too distracted by tunnel vision. Now the polling firm is trying to spin it in favor of their client, which is very unusual. So much for credibility…

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:50:16 +0000

Hmmm, they must not be a very good polling company. I mean usually a polling company sets the questions up so the responses always come back in favor of whomever is paying them. I guess maybe they didn’t understand what they were suppose to be accomplishing.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:00:22 +0000

Canned surveys. This should serve as a lesson to mainstream media who keep pushing industry spin without questioning its merits.

Long live civil liberty on an untainted internet, in Canada that is.