Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

p2pnet talks to Michael Geist

p2p Q&A / p2pnet: Dr Michael Geist has become a power in Canada and much further afield when it comes to matters centering on Net issues in particular, and free speech and the freedom of the Net in general.

Born and raised in Toronto and the proud father of “three great kids” (7, 5, and 2), he’s the University of Ottawa’s Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law, a position he’s held since 2003. Before going to U of O seven years ago, he was at a long list of law schools including Columbia Law School in New York, Dalhousie Law School in Halifax, Canada, Cambridge University in England, and Kobe University in Japan, where he was doing graduate work and some teaching.

His editorial output is prolific. He produces numerous professional publications and writes for Canada’s Toronto Star and Ottawa Citizen, and England’s BBC, and p2pnet is proud to regularly run his columns. He’s also on the director and advisory boards of several internet and IT law organizations including the Canadian Internet Registration Authority, the dot-ca administrative agency, the Canadian IT Law Association, and Watchfire.

The former chair of a global Internet jurisdiction project for the American Bar Association and International Chamber of Commerce, Geist is regularly quoted in the national and international media on internet law issues and has appeared before government committees on e-commerce policy.

Obviously, with a work-load such as that and three lively children, he doesn’t have much in the way of free time but when he does, he’s a big sports fan who, although he’s an Ottawa Senators season ticket holder, is also a “a die-hard Toronto Maple Leafs hockey fan”. And when he gets the chance, he takes in “a fair amount of music” on his iPod, “in addition to a growing list of podcasts.”

One of his favourite bands is Green Day, and he’s also a Springsteen fan.

“I really like Pandora for listening to new stuff,” he says. “I buy music on Apple iTunes and also download occasional stuff. Frankly, most of my P2P downloading tends to be torrents of video files of recent lectures or other video content.”

BitTorrent is his application of choice for downloads.

Do you think Canada will ever be in the same situation as the US where even young children can become CRIA (Canadian Recording Industry Association of America) victims? – we asked him in the Q&A below.

“I hope not,” he says

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

p2pnet: You’ve become a virtual spokesman for copyright common sense not only in Canada, but in other parts of the world. Is this something you deliberately set out to achieve?

Geist: : No, not at all. My focus has traditionally been on Internet issues and I’m very active on privacy, spam, Internet governance issues. The growing attention to copyright merely reflects its critical importance to the Internet and to creativity and culture more generally.

`

p2pnet: Does the role sit well with you?

`

Geist: : I think there are a lot of people who do great work in this area. I’m fortunate to have some platforms to speak out and educate – such as a regular newspaper column and my blog. These are issues that have not gained significant awareness in the past and I’m happy to help change that.

p2pnet: How much real influence do you think the entertainment and software industries have over decisions made in Ottawa and elsewhere?

Geist: : Enormous influence – they’re clearly one of, if not the single most successful lobbying concerns worldwide as their influence extends internationally, nationally, and even at the local levels. In Ottawa, I think that policy makers are genuinely interested in hearing all perspectives. Once their work turns into a bill, however, we’ll see the power of the lobby come to the fore.

p2pnet: Do you think they have undue influence? If so, should it be curbed, and can it be?

Geist: : They certainly have far more resources than any other stakeholder group. I think it is essential that other stakeholders – particularly those who represent the public interest – receive active support so that their views are heard. In the US, there are many groups (EFF, CDT, Public Knowledge, ACLU, EPIC, IP Justice, etc) that work in the area. We don’t have nearly that kind of support in Canada as I think CIPPIC, the public interest technology law clinic that I helped establish at the University of Ottawa, is one of the only similar groups in Canada.

p2pnet: Is it acceptable for elected politicians to accept benefits from the entertainment and software industries, and to so obviously (and actively) represent their interests against those of their constituents?

Geist: : No. That issue sat at the heart of my very public fight with former MP Sarmite Bulte. These are tough issues and I think it is critical that the process be both fair and seen to be fair. When you have MPs in decision making positions, they shouldn’t be seen to be aligning themselves with any single stakeholder group. It was for that reason that I proposed the copyright pledge. It didn’t say that politicians couldn’t take money from lobby groups – only that they couldn’t take the cash and then directly influence policy by sitting as Minister, Parliamentary Secretary, or on the relevant House of Commons committee.

p2pnet: Have you ever been approached to work with, or for, any of the entertainment or software companies?

Geist: : I talk with many groups and companies all the time. While we may disagree on certain issues, the complexity of copyright is such that your opponent on one issue, may be your ally on another.

p2pnet: Are you able to sit down and have a reasoned, and reasonable, discussion on copyright and other related issues with the people who make the corporate decisions?

Geist: : I am. There are some people who don’t want to talk, but they’re in the minority.

p2pnet: Is it acceptable for the purely commercial labels, studios and software houses to so easily use, and be an integral part of, police and other agency raids and enforcement operations the industries themselves usually initiate?

Geist: : I think true commercial piracy – the sort where commercial operations churn out infringing software or DVDs for sale and profit – is obviously wrong and the law should be used to stop such activities.

p2pnet: Is copyright ‘crime’ a crime at all?

Geist: : I think it’s fair to say that the commercial piracy described above is a crime. I don’t think that the non-commercial copying that we see on P2P networks falls into that category, however.

p2pnet: Would you agree that if the software and entertainment companies were to use p2p technologies for handling and distribution, a reduction both in counterfeiting and duplicating and in costs associated with physical product would follow?

Geist: : I think P2P represents a tremendous commercial opportunity for those groups. I think it has the potential to reduce distribution costs. I’m not sure that it would have an impact on commercial counterfeiting.

p2pnet: Should the cartels be allowed to have a definite presence in schools and universities via their so-called ‘educational’ programs?

Geist: : I think it’s up to the schools to ensure that their students gain a balanced perspective on these issues. Educators wouldn’t tolerate commercial messaging in other areas and shouldn’t here either. It’s essential that educators take that role seriously by educating their students on the full range of copyright issues including their user rights to use works without prior permission.

p2pnet: Do you believe people who share files with each other online are ‘thieves’ and ‘criminals’ as the CRIA, et al, claim?

Geist: : No.

p2pnet: Is file sharing really “devastating” (to quote the CRIA claim) the music industry and its various elements?

Geist: : I don’t believe so. I’m sure it has some impact, but it’s hard to know precisely what that impact is as there’s some evidence that the impact is positive, not negative. Regardless, the decline in sales that the major labels have experienced in recent years is almost certainly about a host of issues that have little to do with P2P, including more consumer entertainment choices, pricing, changes in the retail distribution of music, the decline of radio, and the releases being brought to market.

p2pnet: Do you think the wholesale price of between 60 and 80 cents for a single Big Four digital file is fair?

Geist: : I don’t know. In an open market, the market would set the price. Obviously people like NY Attorney General Eliot Spitzer are skeptical that the market is truly functioning appropriately without unlawful and anti-competitive interference.

p2pnet: Does a download equal a lost sale?

Geist: : No. I don’t think anybody would argue that it does. Even the Copyright Board of Canada has valued a downloaded song as a lesser value that the CD version for purposes of the private copying levy.

p2pnet: Are file sharers and counterfeiters equally and jointly responsible for entertainmment and software industry downturns, as the CRIA and other trade-cum-PR units suggest repeatedly?

Geist: : I don’t think file sharers and counterfeiters should be equated – there is a significant difference between the two. As for industry downturns, I’m not sure that those industries are making those claims. For example, the video game software industry is enjoying enormous growth, while the movie industry is experiencing terrific revenues from DVD sales and other new licensing opportunities.

p2pnet: Should parents he held responsible under the law for something their children may, or may not, have done?

Geist: : Well, certainly not for something their children didn’t do. The better question is whether we should hold anyone liable to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages for P2P activity. I think not – statutory damages provisions should be amended to address this misuse of the law.

p2pnet: Do you agree that blogs and bloggers are replacing the traditional media as disseminators of news and information?

Geist: : I’m not sure they’re replacing traditional media, but they are obviously having an enormous impact on the dissemination of news, opinion, and information. I think blogs often provide more timely, more informed analysis that you will find in the mainstream media and thus either replace or complement MSM coverage. I also think that we’re seeing a growing convergence between the two – newspapers are starting to look a lot like blogs – take the redesign of the Globe and Mail as an example.

p2pnet: Do you think they’re having, or will have, an influence on what the labels, studios and software makers do?

Geist: : I think bloggers are having an influence on all aspects of society, including public policy and corporate decision making.

p2pnet: Do you think Canada will ever be in the same situation as the US where even young children will become CRIA victims?

Geist: : I hope not. I’m hopeful that Canada can develop a model that benefits all stakeholders and does not resort to damaging litigation that serves no one’s best interests.

HOME

One Response to “p2pnet talks to Michael Geist”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    Michael Geist is also one of the most one-eyed writers at times, pretty much like what is churned out here on a regular basis. I can agree with him at times and at other times I think that his personal bias really screws with his logic. Pity.

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    Excellent insight, thanks for this interview. Michael Geist is one of the few academics stepping up to the plate on copyright issues and I THANK HIM for it. One only needs to look at the situation in the USA to understand what happens when BIG money and BIG lobbying takes control of policy.

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    Excellent insight, thanks for this interview. Michael Geist is one of the few academics stepping up to the plate on copyright issues and I THANK HIM for it. One only needs to look at the situation in the USA to understand what happens when BIG money and BIG lobbying takes control of policy.

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    I wish all policy makers around the world shared michael’s fair and unbiased stance on these issues.

    However, i don’t really agree with canada’s levy. No industry should be allowed to generate revenue without even selling a product, and thats just what these levy’s are.

    If the cartels had it their way, you would be taxed on everything, cpu/hardrives/cdroms/breathing. Ok the last one was exaggerating, but in all seriousness, soon they wont need to sell any products because they will earn money just by sitting around collecting taxes/levys.

  5. Reader's Write Says:

    Most Canadians aware of this levy (its been around so long) aren’t particularly fond of it either. This, however, goes to show the bottomless pit of greed these cartels are capable of. They’ve been skimming money from blank media sales for decades and still that’s not enough.

    But frankly, between a levy and seeing a downright assault on liberties (read DMCA) as has happened to our friends south of the border, I’ll continue chipping in my $0.20 per CD/DVD if prevents it happening here.

  6. Reader's Write Says:

    Yeah I agree Michael is biast – he’s representing vested interests – OURS – pity the content industry cant remember its consumers, pity they cant remember that copyright was never meant to be an absolute property right, pity they cant think of the benefits of a free culture, pity they cant think of anything but $hareholder$ and pity they dont run their own public comments website – imagine them having to deal with 250 million trolls…. at least we only have to deal with the occassional dill on this site

  7. Reader's Write Says:

    I believe that Dr. Geist attended Dalhousie Law School, not Dalhouse Law School. I’d be pleased to buy him dinner at McKelvie’s on Lower Water Street the next time we were both in Halifax.

    –TG

  8. Reader's Write Says:

    “No industry should be allowed to generate revenue without even selling a product, and thats just what these levy’s are.”

    Does anyone know how the money collected is distributed among the creators? Or does the money only go to the copyright cartels?

  9. Reader's Write Says:

    Actually, if you look at Dr. Geist’s previous postings you will find that he is one of the most adamant people against the private copying levy:

    http://michaelgeist.ca/component/option,com_content/task,view/id,1126/Itemid,85/
    http://michaelgeist.ca/component/option,com_content/task,view/id,1157/Itemid,85/

    And there are more from where that came from.

  10. Reader's Write Says:

    Huh, whomever said he was for it? As posted above, most Canadians aware of this hidden tax/levy/cartel extortion are not fond of it.

  11. Reader's Write Says:

    This begs the question, who the hell are these individuals bashing one of the few defenders of the people anyways?

  12. Reader's Write Says:

    geist is a stand-up Canadian who unlike most of our politicians has world respect

    ignore trolls and shills

  13. Reader's Write Says:

    Actually it should be seen as a compliment. I believe that Geist would be the first to admit that controversy and debate are vital. And I believe he would also have no issues with personal criticism. That is the hallmark of a good academic.

  14. Reader's Write Says:

    I haven’t seen any polls about what “most Canadians” feel about the levy, but I’d appreciate any references. There might also be a matter of context here. I’m not exactly “fond” of the levy either, but considering that it is the means by which I have the legal right to download songs under the Copyright Act, I’ll take it. It’s the lesser of many evils. It might not be perfect, but I have yet to see a perfect system proposed.

    Artists should be compensated for their work, but they (or especially the recording companies) should not have such powerful rights to hinder normal usage and undermine new and useful technologies for the sake of personal profit. Copyright laws exist for the purpose of promoting progress, not personal profit.

  15. Reader's Write Says:

    “Does anyone know how the money collected is distributed among the creators? Or does the money only go to the copyright cartels?”

    Last I’ve heard that hadn’t distributed a single cent of the money collected. If they ever do, of course it will get handed over to the publishing cartels rather than to artists.

  16. Reader's Write Says:

    Given Ms. Bulte’s performance in the recent election, it appears that she must have acquired her familiarity with the law at the Outhousie Law School.

  17. Reader's Write Says:

    The copyright levy is collected by a group representing the recording industry.The CPCC began making payments early in 2003.

    http://www.cpcc.ca/english/generalInfo.htm

  18. Reader's Write Says:

    I personally can’t remember ever buying a CD-R for burning music, yet every time I did/do the music industry skimms off it. But if policy makers can’t put up a fight against cartels who’s profits exceed many countries GDP, I’ll take the levy over restrictions and seeing fellow Canadians ruined by lawsuits.

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
MP3Rocket


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®