Comments on: Fair use in Hungary: II

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 01 Apr 2006 18:28:45 +0000

“As a composer of worldwide reputation”

Why should I beleive this, anonymous?

And how much money has been paid to you?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 01 Apr 2006 12:56:12 +0000

Thanks to Benedek Toth for all the background information. It is this type of discussion we need to make sure we know all sides of the story.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 01 Apr 2006 11:15:10 +0000

I fully disagree with the zest of the article and fully agree with Artisjus’s policies. As a composer of worldwide reputation, they serve my interest better than most copyright protectors. The levies are used to maintain artistic freedom from the abuse of commercially driven non-artists’ mass-produced garbage. There is no such thing as “right wing art”, no matter how much the corporate establishment would like to suffocate anything that is done with an iota of conscience. So, I support Artisjus fully. Art is simply not a commodity. It has never been one. Period.

Composer of real art, Anonymous