Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Apple v Does

p2p news / p2pnet: Apple did its best to use its power, weight and money to block a journalist from doing what journalists do.

Report.

Steve Jobs, who’s acquiring a well-deserved reputation for being unremittingly petty-minded and mean, didn’t like the fact news on Asteroid, an at-the-time forthcoming product, showed up online.

Now, "On April 20, a California Court of Appeal will hear arguments in Apple v. Does, a case with broad implications for all journalists. EFF is fighting to ensure that bloggers and other online writers get the same rights as offline journalists and can protect the confidentiality of their sources," posts Derek Slater on Deep Links, going on:

"As you may recall, Apple is suing several unnamed individuals, called ‘Does,’ who allegedly leaked information about an upcoming product code-named ‘Asteroid.’ Apple has subpoenaed Nfox, the ISP for PowerPage publisher Jason O’Grady, demanding that the ISP turn over the communications and unpublished materials O’Grady obtained while he was gathering information for his articles about ‘Asteroid.’ Apple has also been granted permission to issue subpoenas directly to EFF clients PowerPage and AppleInsider for similar information.

"In a decision whose sweeping terms threaten every journalist, whether publishing in print, radio, television, or on the Internet, the trial court denied the protective order and held that a journalist’s publication of information that a business deems a trade secret destroys the constitutional protections for the journalist’s confidential sources and unpublished information. EFF petitioned to correct the trial court’s manifest error and restore the previously well-settled constitutional protections for a journalist’s confidential information, upon which the practice of journalism and the freedom of the press depend.

"On June 2, 2005, the California Court of Appeal issued an Order to Show Cause, asking Apple to show the Court ‘why a peremptory writ should not issue as requested in the petition’ that EFF filed on behalf of these online journalists. The Court has now set an April 20, 2006 hearing on this important issue."

Also See:
showed up onlineNew Apple Asteroid trouble, Septrember 13, 2005
Deep LinksHearing Set for Appeal in Key Bloggers’ Rights Case, March 30, 2006

HOME

2 Responses to “Apple v Does”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    the fascist Jobs goes to court April 20, Hitler’s birthday.

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    Perhaps that bout with cancer destroyed more than a few cells South of Job’s collarbone.

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
MP3Rocket


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®