<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US &#8216;dragnet surveillance&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8456/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8456</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8456/comment-page-1#comment-37887</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-37887</guid>
		<description>Yes, but your reply side-steps the issue of why the administration will not submit to judicial oversight. And in this case &quot;Because they can&quot; is an unsatisfactory answer. This is exactly the kind of thing that is imploding the repub party. Perhaps george and dick have moved beyond even caring about that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but your reply side-steps the issue of why the administration will not submit to judicial oversight. And in this case &#8220;Because they can&#8221; is an unsatisfactory answer. This is exactly the kind of thing that is imploding the repub party. Perhaps george and dick have moved beyond even caring about that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8456/comment-page-1#comment-37651</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 05:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-37651</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s it really. They have the capabilities - once the automation is set up, it&#039;s easy and cheap - and it MAY be useful to them at some point in the future. So as far as the NSA is concerned, why NOT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s it really. They have the capabilities &#8211; once the automation is set up, it&#8217;s easy and cheap &#8211; and it MAY be useful to them at some point in the future. So as far as the NSA is concerned, why NOT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8456/comment-page-1#comment-37635</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 23:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-37635</guid>
		<description>Anybody who thinks this NSA/bush admin skullduggery is really about thwarting &quot;turrarists&quot; is living in a dream world.

If the fed only has American citizen&#039;s best interests in mind then why the pig headed resistance to any judicial oversight? WHY? 

It&#039;s not security, the courts that would oversee this activity are secret. 

It&#039;s not about slowing down the process, they can file for warrants after the fact. 

WHY?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody who thinks this NSA/bush admin skullduggery is really about thwarting &#8220;turrarists&#8221; is living in a dream world.</p>
<p>If the fed only has American citizen&#8217;s best interests in mind then why the pig headed resistance to any judicial oversight? WHY? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not security, the courts that would oversee this activity are secret. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not about slowing down the process, they can file for warrants after the fact. </p>
<p>WHY?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


