Canadian musicians vs Big Music
p2p news / p2pnet: “Jon, this is huge,” emails Canadian Net and copyright expert Dr Michael Geist. “Some very big names in Canadian music (Barenaked Ladies, Avril Lavigne, Sarah McLachlan, Chantal Kreviazuk, Sum 41, Sloan among others) have come out against P2P lawsuits, against statutory damages, against DRM, and against anti-circumvention legislation.”
Fronted by its CRIA (Canadian Recording Industry Association of America), the Big Four Organized Music cartel is trying to turn Canada into a mini-America where whatever the entertainment industry dictates, happens.
Now, as Geist points out, Canadian musicians and others have decided to take a stand in a new coalition called, appropriately, the Canadian Music Creators Coalition.
Members include, Barenaked Ladies, Avril Lavigne, Sarah McLachlan, Chantal Kreviazuk, Sum 41, Stars, Raine Maida (Our Lady Peace), Dave Bidini (Rheostatics), Billy Talent, John K. Samson (Weakerthans), Broken Social Scene, Sloan, Andrew Cash and Bob Wiseman.
In the US, it’s now routine for the Big Four, Warner Music, Vivendi Universal, EMI and Sony BMG, to fire subpoenas at music lovers, including young children, implying the documents amount to ‘prosecutions’.
Some 19,000 men, women and children have become terrified victims. And the record labels want to be able to launch their bizarre sue ‘em all marketing campaign in Canada, and elsewhere in the world.
They call music lovers thieves, although nothing has been stolen. They say a download equals a lost sale, although this has never, ever been demonstrated. They say file sharing is a crime, although there’s no such offence.
Imagine. Imagine if other artists around the world followed the Canadian lead.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
We are a growing coalition of Canadian music creators who share the common goal of having our voices heard about the laws and policies that affect our livelihoods. We are the people who actually create Canadian music. Without us, there would be no music for copyright laws to protect.
Until now, a group of multinational record labels has done most of the talking about what Canadian artists need out of copyright. Record companies and music publishers are not our enemies, but let’s be clear: lobbyists for major labels are looking out for their shareholders, and seldom speak for Canadian artists. Legislative proposals that would facilitate lawsuits against our fans or increase the labels’ control over the enjoyment of music are made not in our names, but on behalf of the labels’ foreign parent companies.
It is the government’s responsibility to protect Canadian artists from exploitation. This requires a firm commitment to programs that support Canadian music talent, and a fresh approach to copyright law reform. Canadian music creators have identified three principles that should guide the copyright reform process.
1. Suing Our Fans is Destructive and Hypocritical
Artists do not want to sue music fans. The labels have been suing our fans against our will, and laws enabling these suits cannot be justified in our names. We oppose any copyright reforms that would make it easier for record companies to do this. The government should repeal provisions of the Copyright Act that allow labels to unfairly punish fans who share music for non-commercial purposes with statutory damages of $500 to $20,000 per song.
2. Digital Locks are Risky and Counterproductive
Artists do not support using digital locks to increase the labels’ control over the distribution, use and enjoyment of music or laws that prohibit circumvention of such technological measures. The government should not blindly implement decade-old treaties designed to give control to major labels and take choices away from artists and consumers. Laws should protect artists and consumers, not restrictive technologies. Consumers should be able to transfer the music they buy to other formats under a right of fair use, without having to pay twice.
3. Cultural Policy Should Support Actual Canadian Artists
The vast majority of new Canadian music is not promoted by major labels, which focus mostly on foreign artists. The government should use other policy tools to support actual Canadian artists and a thriving musical and cultural scene. The government should make a long-term commitment to grow support mechanisms like the Canada Music Fund and FACTOR, invest in music training and education, create limited tax shelters for copyright royalties, protect artists from inequalities in bargaining power and make collecting societies more transparent.






April 26th, 2006 at 3:54 pm
A word to the wise:
CRIA is Canadian Recording Industry Association, not Canadian Recording Industry Association of America.
April 26th, 2006 at 4:22 pm
CRIA’s board of directors now comprises members of the BIG FOUR labels only! It is the RIAA’s Canadian branch and if American artists can muster half the balls they have, there may be hope yet.
April 26th, 2006 at 4:31 pm
“A word to the wise:
CRIA is Canadian Recording Industry Association, not Canadian Recording Industry Association of America.”
Thanks for at least pretending you find us wise, we do of course realize CRIAA/RIAA shills like yourself think of all Canadians as sheep who should just continue to consume the product they choose for us.
Actually is more like
Canadian Recording Industry Association of Multinational Corporations
But let’s be fair now, the name they choose does NOT represent what they are at all, and is very misleading.
Of course to name them for what they really are:
Political Lobbyist (Bribers) Working for the Multinational Corporations who Strive to Control Copyrights & Copyright Laws of Canada.
Or PLBWMCSCC&CLC for short would not sit well with the general public, so they hide behind their chosen name, pretending to work for Canadian citizens, and artist/creators best interest.
April 26th, 2006 at 4:53 pm
This is the biggest news to hit this industry and confirms what’s always been suspected:
MANY ARTISTS ARE AGAINST DRM AND LAWSUITS
All it took was for a few to get the courage to come out of the closet. If American artists can closet their greed for the slightest moment, this could be the beginning of a turnaround.
April 26th, 2006 at 4:58 pm
as long as people like sheryl crow – who heads the RAC – and her cronies are around, it’ll be a cold day in hell before any large group in the usa stands up in the same way. they don’t care about their fans. most of them (including crow) admit to never even visiting wheir own websites.
April 26th, 2006 at 5:10 pm
CRIA, eh?
But thanks for pointing it out ; )
Cheers!
April 26th, 2006 at 6:55 pm
Its time to start buying these Canadian artists cds. I have been boycotting for quite a few years now. But I will definitly be buying stuff from these guys.
April 26th, 2006 at 11:42 pm
I was just thinking about the same thing. This would allow me to support an artist who cares about their fans instead of the RIAA cancer that’s ruining the American music industry.
April 27th, 2006 at 12:08 am
odds are they are distributed via a RIAA/CRIAA company.
April 28th, 2006 at 2:19 am
Actually. most are from Nettwerk, who is currently feilding the legal fees for a family in texas being sued by the RIAA for downloading an avril lavigne song. the RIAA wanted 900 dollars for a song by an artist on a record label that isn’t part of the RIAA. who is really the criminal, eh?
nettwerk: http://www.nettwerk.com/
April 28th, 2006 at 6:56 pm
and who handles the marketing/distribution in the states?