<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rupert versus The Beeb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8662/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8662</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8662/comment-page-1#comment-39937</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 13:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-39937</guid>
		<description>Sigh. Well they would say that, wouldn&#039;t they.

The BBC sets the bar in terms of quality. Certainly for the UK and, I suspect, for outside as well.

What would your media be like without the BBC?

What would your on-line experience be like without the BBC?

If you say &quot;no different&quot; I believe you ought to examine the chain of references/influences that creates &#039;your&#039; content and see how much points back to the Beeb, small-world-networking or no.

Yup, I&#039;m British. Yup, I pay the licence fee. No, I don&#039;t mind it as a &#039;media tax&#039; because I feel I&#039;m getting value for money particularly since my licence fee is a *lot* cheaper than cable/satellite subscription for much better quality (speak up Murdoch, what was that muttering). And no, I don&#039;t mind if non-uk areas benefit &#039;downstream&#039; from the content I pay for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh. Well they would say that, wouldn&#8217;t they.</p>
<p>The BBC sets the bar in terms of quality. Certainly for the UK and, I suspect, for outside as well.</p>
<p>What would your media be like without the BBC?</p>
<p>What would your on-line experience be like without the BBC?</p>
<p>If you say &#8220;no different&#8221; I believe you ought to examine the chain of references/influences that creates &#8216;your&#8217; content and see how much points back to the Beeb, small-world-networking or no.</p>
<p>Yup, I&#8217;m British. Yup, I pay the licence fee. No, I don&#8217;t mind it as a &#8216;media tax&#8217; because I feel I&#8217;m getting value for money particularly since my licence fee is a *lot* cheaper than cable/satellite subscription for much better quality (speak up Murdoch, what was that muttering). And no, I don&#8217;t mind if non-uk areas benefit &#8216;downstream&#8217; from the content I pay for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8662/comment-page-1#comment-39342</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 05:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-39342</guid>
		<description>Well if nobody is going to keep Murdoch&#039;s own digital empire in check, I guess the taxpayers will just have to build their own to compete.

I kinda like the idea of having a small stake in a community owned media outlet, even if the community is an entire country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if nobody is going to keep Murdoch&#8217;s own digital empire in check, I guess the taxpayers will just have to build their own to compete.</p>
<p>I kinda like the idea of having a small stake in a community owned media outlet, even if the community is an entire country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8662/comment-page-1#comment-39330</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 02:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-39330</guid>
		<description>Three cheers for Auntie Beeb, may she live and prosper for ever more. With all their radio stations, tv stations, and websites they are worth every penny and more than we pay already! 
As for Rupe, he is &#039;running&#039; one of the two most dispensable companys ever known to mankind! The other of course being Mr. Gate&#039;s Mob.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three cheers for Auntie Beeb, may she live and prosper for ever more. With all their radio stations, tv stations, and websites they are worth every penny and more than we pay already!<br />
As for Rupe, he is &#8216;running&#8217; one of the two most dispensable companys ever known to mankind! The other of course being Mr. Gate&#8217;s Mob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8662/comment-page-1#comment-39328</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 02:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-39328</guid>
		<description>And why not? The BBC is meant to be for the people as people pay for it.  

Just get over it, I am from the UK and think time we got rid of TV licence (Tax).  Here my plan first make all broadcasters in UK (TV/Radio) be charged an Tax on income from Ad&#039;s/ Product placement/ Premium Rate phone numbers/Sales items/ Subscription/ PPV.  So TV/Radio broadcasters are tax for there income which pay for BBC.

Way cool, just love to see Sky (aka News International) pay billions a year to BBC, ha ha!
What is more interesting is the likes of Google, Yahoo an co have made no such comment!  


http://www.bbc.co.uk/info/licencefee/
http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/
http://www.tvlicensing.biz/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And why not? The BBC is meant to be for the people as people pay for it.  </p>
<p>Just get over it, I am from the UK and think time we got rid of TV licence (Tax).  Here my plan first make all broadcasters in UK (TV/Radio) be charged an Tax on income from Ad&#8217;s/ Product placement/ Premium Rate phone numbers/Sales items/ Subscription/ PPV.  So TV/Radio broadcasters are tax for there income which pay for BBC.</p>
<p>Way cool, just love to see Sky (aka News International) pay billions a year to BBC, ha ha!<br />
What is more interesting is the likes of Google, Yahoo an co have made no such comment!  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/info/licencefee/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/info/licencefee/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.tvlicensing.biz/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tvlicensing.biz/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


