Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Scroogle Search: 
Search
 
Web p2pnet   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
    Sponsored by
Frostwire
 
p2pnet
 


mp3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Canadian musicians’ revolution

p2p news / p2pnet: Canadian musicians are leading the way in music reform, with Barenaked Ladies Steve Page fast becoming their official spokesman.

Last week came the news that BNL, Avril Lavigne, Sarah McLachlan, Chantal Kreviazuk, Sum 41, Broken Social Scene, Stars, Raine Maida of Our Lady Peace, Dave Bidini of Rheostatics, Billy Talent, John K. Sampson of Weakerthans, Sloan, Andrew Cash, and Bob Wiseman, co-founder of Blue Rodeo, had formed the Canadian Music Creators Coalition.

They were concerned, "with the prospect of record-label lawsuits against MP3 file sharers, and the continuing march toward greater restrictions on the use of music," says BNL’s Steve Page in a National Post OpEd.

"We know that record companies and music publishers are not our enemies," he says. "They are often run by people who love music and are passionate about the promotion of Canadian culture.

"Much of their lobbying, however, is not about protecting artists or promoting Canadian culture. It is about propping up business models in the recording industry that are quickly becoming obsolete and unsustainable. It is about preserving foreign-based power structures and further entrenching the labels’ role as industry gatekeepers. Their lobbying efforts are focused on passing laws that restrict artists’ ability to take control of their own music, reach their fans in more direct ways and earn a decent living from music without sacrificing their autonomy."

Page then emphasizes three points originally raised in the announcement of the coalition’s creation, in the group’s first white paper, and again in a CTV interview, namely that he and his colleagues had, "identified three simple principles that should guide copyright reform and cultural policy".

First, we believe that suing our fans is destructive and hypocritical. We do not want to sue music fans, and we do not want to distort the law to coerce fans into conforming to a rigid digital market artificially constructed by the major labels.

Second, we believe that the use of digital locks, frequently referred to as technological protection measures, are risky and counterproductive. We do not support using digital locks to increase the labels’ control over the distribution, use and enjoyment of music, nor do we support laws that prohibit circumvention of such technological measures, including Canadian accession to the World Intellectual Property Organization’s Internet Treaties. These treaties are designed to give control to major labels and take choices away from artists and consumers. Laws should protect artists and consumers, not restrictive technologies.

Third, we strongly believe that cultural policy should support actual Canadian artists. We call on the Canadian government to firmly commit to programs that support Canadian music talent. The government should make a long-term commitment to grow support mechanisms such as the Canada Music Fund and FACTOR, invest in music training and education, create limited tax shelters for copyright royalties, protect artists from inequalities in bargaining power and make collecting societies more transparent.

Reactions to the new coalition have been, "incredibly positive," says Page.

"Dozens of additional Canadian artists, including Randy Bachman, Sam Roberts, Feist and Blue Rodeo’s Greg Keelor, have all jumped on board. Music fans across Canada and around the world have expressed their support as we repair the bonds between artists and their fans.

"The ‘products of the mind’ for which the record labels claim to seek protection are the products of our minds. The legislative proposals that would facilitate lawsuits against our fans or increase the labels’ control over the enjoyment of music are not made in our names.

"It is the government’s responsibility to protect Canadian artists from exploitation. This requires a firm commitment from Industry Minister Maxime Bernier and Canadian Heritage Minister Bev Oda to programs that support Canadian music talent and a fresh approach to copyright law reform. The continued growth of Canada’s vibrant music scene requires policies that priorize musicians, not outdated business and the corporate bottom line."

Also See:
National PostA Barenaked guide to music copyright reform, May 1, 2006
creationCanadian musicians vs Big Music, April 24, 2006
white paper – ‘Fans who share music aren’t thieves’, April 26, 2006
CTV interviewBNL’s Steve Page on suing fans, April 27, 2006

HOME

6 Responses to “Canadian musicians’ revolution”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    “Music fans across Canada and around the world have expressed their support as we repair the bonds between artists and their fans.”

    Indeed, I have completely stopped consuming music products ever since the Napster fiasco. Their coming out against cartel abuse has given me the urge to become a music fan again, but not until I see change.

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    At last it’s happening. The artists no longer need the big studios to put together decent music. They no longer need terrestrial radio to get their songs heard, plus now the audience is world wide instead of however big their record company permits. And finally, they no longer need a physical CD to be sold for fans to buy their music directly from the original artists in lossless format.

    So now they have realized that they can make whatever type of music they want, whenever they want, have it heard by billions for free, and keep all of the money they make from sales for themselves.

    I hope all the children the RIAA has sued get a good laugh out of this one. I know I am.

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    you know I would more excited about this if it had happened sooner. But I guess it wasn’t politically expedient to get involved a few years back … remember those days? The government was seeking submissions on changes to the Copyright Act, CRIA tried dragging 29 p2p users into court … Martin and the Heritage Minister spouting off crap at the Juno awards. You know, those things that matter but to come out now when the copyright revision process is dead in the water just make me think … meh.

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    Well, as much as I’d like to keep government in a minority position forever, there will come a day when a Bush like politician with a majority will see fit to bring us back to medieval times. Lobbyists are more powerful than ever, now is as good a time as ever to thwart their agenda.

  5. Reader's Write Says:

    me again.

    “Bush like politician”

    Actually it was the Liberal Heritage Minister Sam Bulte (who was in the pockets of CRIA and other lobbying forces) who wanted to implement draconian copyright laws … remember the Bulte Report? (how soon we forget)

    Whereas Ben Oda has said: “Copyright legislation has to be amended to make [compliant] our copyright laws and ratify the international treaties.”

    ps: I despise the refor…*ahem* conservative party but could care less who is in power so long as changes to the law aren’t anything like how the USA has interpreted the WIPO treaty and nothing like what the CRIA puppet Sam Bulte suggested when she was the Heritage Minister.

    /pro-user zealot

  6. Reader's Write Says:

    You’re intepreting my comment “Bush like politician” as a politically biased example when in fact it was meant as a reference to coprorate sell-outs, no matter which Party they’re from.

Leave a Reply

ONLY items referencing the post at hand, please. No links to personal sites, no personal attacks, trolling, freebie advertising, or off-topic posts. Thanks. And Cheers!

    Sponsored by
tek savvy