<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google click fraud case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8731/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8731</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8731/comment-page-1#comment-40277</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 13:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-40277</guid>
		<description>Here, any google executives that happen to read this site - pay freaking attention to this internet basic logic that most ppl who&#039;ve been around already know.

Avoid lawsuits: Run an active script to monitor ip hits. Only allow an ip address ONE credited hit per 24 hour period PER site. All other clicks/views of ad&#039;s would be uncredited.

Lawsuits would never exist and neither would the moronic ad-senseless account problems.

Get a clue google - before Microsoft 0\/\/N3Z ya!

Just my 10 cents, lol!
_-Jile-_</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here, any google executives that happen to read this site &#8211; pay freaking attention to this internet basic logic that most ppl who&#8217;ve been around already know.</p>
<p>Avoid lawsuits: Run an active script to monitor ip hits. Only allow an ip address ONE credited hit per 24 hour period PER site. All other clicks/views of ad&#8217;s would be uncredited.</p>
<p>Lawsuits would never exist and neither would the moronic ad-senseless account problems.</p>
<p>Get a clue google &#8211; before Microsoft 0\/\/N3Z ya!</p>
<p>Just my 10 cents, lol!<br />
_-Jile-_</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8731/comment-page-1#comment-40206</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 22:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-40206</guid>
		<description>Whats not to understand here on Google&#039;s actions? Its their new business strategy. Accuse their advertisers of click-fraud in order not to pay them and then give them back a small fraction of the money owed. Funny how Google&#039;s motto is &quot;not to be evil&quot; when their actions are exactly against that they are &quot;evil&quot;. I still use Google search, and Gmail but other than that I dont support and use Google at all. I won&#039;t even use their Adsense, which is more like Adnonsense. There are smaller sites and which don&#039;t accuse and run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whats not to understand here on Google&#8217;s actions? Its their new business strategy. Accuse their advertisers of click-fraud in order not to pay them and then give them back a small fraction of the money owed. Funny how Google&#8217;s motto is &#8220;not to be evil&#8221; when their actions are exactly against that they are &#8220;evil&#8221;. I still use Google search, and Gmail but other than that I dont support and use Google at all. I won&#8217;t even use their Adsense, which is more like Adnonsense. There are smaller sites and which don&#8217;t accuse and run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


