<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meet Peer To Patent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8739/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8739</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:10:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8739/comment-page-1#comment-41158</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41158</guid>
		<description>Nice one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8739/comment-page-1#comment-40298</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 22:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-40298</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Constitution intended for patents to foster innovation and the promotion of progress in the useful arts.&quot;

Isn&#039;t it about time that the premise of the Contitution be challenged and not taken for granted. Of course no challenge will come from tech firms and their consultants.

After all, the creators of the Constitution thought that slavery was a good thing. Certainly the constitution founders were not as holy and as wise as they have been painted to be. Even the political system they set up is broken, a system where money and last name (Bush, Kennedy,  Rockefeller, etc) is the determining factor as to who &quot;represents&quot; the people.

I personlly think that world progress will speed up if there were no patent system used to exploit the poorer and less technollogically advanced countries. Admittedly the patent system is good for a few.

Rafael Venegas
http://www.gvenegas.com </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Constitution intended for patents to foster innovation and the promotion of progress in the useful arts.&#8221;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it about time that the premise of the Contitution be challenged and not taken for granted. Of course no challenge will come from tech firms and their consultants.</p>
<p>After all, the creators of the Constitution thought that slavery was a good thing. Certainly the constitution founders were not as holy and as wise as they have been painted to be. Even the political system they set up is broken, a system where money and last name (Bush, Kennedy,  Rockefeller, etc) is the determining factor as to who &#8220;represents&#8221; the people.</p>
<p>I personlly think that world progress will speed up if there were no patent system used to exploit the poorer and less technollogically advanced countries. Admittedly the patent system is good for a few.</p>
<p>Rafael Venegas<br />
<a href="http://www.gvenegas.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gvenegas.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
