<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: France caves in to Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8767/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8767</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8767/comment-page-1#comment-40525</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 19:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-40525</guid>
		<description>&quot;There&#039;s also a provision in the Senate version that may allow Apple not to share its DRM at all. It could go to the digital copyright agency and make the case that its technology is not designed to protect Apple, but rather the musicians whose music it sells. &quot; 

- so it&#039;ll protect the big boys, but when a small company does the same to their software, they can be forced to remove the DRM? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s also a provision in the Senate version that may allow Apple not to share its DRM at all. It could go to the digital copyright agency and make the case that its technology is not designed to protect Apple, but rather the musicians whose music it sells. &#8221; </p>
<p>- so it&#8217;ll protect the big boys, but when a small company does the same to their software, they can be forced to remove the DRM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


