They flagrantly attempted to discredit the site and denigrated me personally, and they had nothing to do with the issues under discussion.

Cheers!

dont like using zip files- this one works

http://gofreespeech.info/p2pnetsuit.pdf

http://s5.quicksharing.com/v/4797947/P2Pnetsuit.zip.html

I checked the file located here personally.
Not only does it have the PDF of the suit, the
text file appears to have all the line items referred in the suit.

Someone did there homework, it appears.

This was posted in another thread ——

“What happens if someone puts up nasty comments online about things that may not be true? Where do you draw the line? Does that amount to free speech? What if for example it was about your own young child?

Think about it for a moment. Imagine there were awful disgusting comments on the site about your own child – do you think that the poster should be allowed to be anonymous? That is the question here!

Lets have some real debate here on this subject instead of non-sensical back and forth slams. ”

————————————-

Same troll Different tune …
Same answer I gave in the othe thread .

The case against P2Pnet is nothing like, or has nothing to do with
the statement above.

Start here ..

http://s5.quicksharing.com/v/4797947/P2Pnetsuit.zip.html

I checked this link out.
It is a free file host site.
The zip file contains a PDF of the court papers, and
a text file with additional info … virus free

Read everything there, then, we can have a good debate
on solid facts. Doest that sound fair and reasonable ?

Debates on emotionally charged examples, that don’t apply to
the real situation only serve to cause knee-jerk, emotional reactions, and THAT’S not true debate.

Think about it for a moment. Imagine there were awful disgusting comments on the site about your own child – do you think that the poster should be allowed to be anonymous? That is the question here!

Lets have some real debate here on this subject instead of non-sensical back and forth slams.

He is defending himself.
In a court of law, where it is appropriate.

And you are right, proof doesn’t cost a cent …..

Anyone who wants to know the situation can …

Start here ..

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/05/18/kazaa_sues_p2pnet/

The UK Register.
They have a link to the complaint.
Don’t like it, sue the Register.
Oh WAIT , can’t do that .. They can afford to fight.

Next,
Find the line items.
They are NOT available on this site any more, but Google is
magic, is it not ?

” Doesn’t this post just prove the point that unless you are feeding the chosen few on this site you are not entitled to practice free speech merely have an entitlement to be subjected to it. ”

Actually Kazaa using it’s cash base to stifle opinions they don’t like
is a MUCH better example of keeping free speech for the
chosen few.

Anyone who wants to know the situation can …

Start here ..

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/05/18/kazaa_sues_p2pnet/

The UK Register.
They have a link to the complaint.
Don’t like it, sue the Register.
Oh WAIT , can’t do that .. They can afford to fight.

Next,
Find the line items.
They are NOT available on this site any more, but Google is
magic, is it not ?

sharlatan made a request to protect their valuable name and the request was answsered but that didnt do it for them becauas what they really wanted was the ip address which jon says he doesnt have and i believe him

Ae you talking about those posts about Sharman that are missing

Jon was ordered by Sharman to remove them.
Isn’t that like Charmin suppressing free speech, not jon ?

Who’s been exiled ?

Wher’s your proof ?

Iam curious

tell me , who ?

It is at http://www.blogsuit.org

I wish there were some way to distinglish the troll posts from the actual worthy responces so that I wouldn’t have to waste my time with verbage that is in essence nothing but hot air and get to the stuff that has the article in mind with the comments.

I’ve sort of slacked off on readership and responce, not because I don’t like the articles but because of the time wasted in filtering out what is un-needed garbage. I’m a long term member and reader of this site; I never ever post as anything but anonymous (coward). Simply the words will stand on their own or won’t, no need of identification to couple with those words. I chose that on purpose. While having a log in, I chose not to use it except for the rare cases. This doesn’t prove to be one of them.

For whatever reason “The Troll” chooses to visit, is not my concern. His disruptions are a waste of time to read. This is the first and last responce I will make to it, as I don’t believe in feeding one but rather perfer to put them on starvation diets.

Uh….yeah……, I was wrong. that’s what my post above says. I was the major ofender on this thread, I’ve admitted it and tried to move on. so why did this lecture need to happen?

BTW I love how you refered to the troll as “it”.

Rick

” These threads speak eloquently to the need for registration on this site. ”

Interesting.
With registration, the information Sharman wants would actually
be in Jon’s hands for Sharman to wring out of him.
Without registration, no amount of chest thumping can get
information that doesn’t exist.

The troll mentioned user registration in one of his other guises.

” That is prtobably not the case but either way Sharman and Ms Hemming must be loving this. It draws attention away from the real issues and that is perfect for them. ”

Yes, he does. And he is deliberately misleading as well.
That is why I have begun to simply post sources to the
Suit information. This way, when the Troll draws attention
away, I bring it right back, with reference points.

Probably not the case ?
An AWFUL lot of effort is being put forth by the troll.
You know with the mutiple personalities and all, don’t YOU
think so, you anonymous mystery person ?

Why did I say it THAT way ???

Two reasons

First,
Registration would allow anyone with wealth that didn’t like what
you said, to bully the info out of a small site. No more mister
anonymous.
If Sharman wins this suit …well read the previous paragraph.
A lot of very wealthy folks with secrets to keep need a precedent
like this to shut bloggers up.

Second,
……