Comments on: p2pnet offensive in Kazaa case

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:34:16 +0000

Just suppose, for the sake of argument …….

The original, Associated Press story’s source is, anonymous.
I couldn’t find anyone credited for it except for Associated
Press.

What if,
The interested parties wanted to know the name of the AP
source so bad they couldn’t see straight ?
Would they go after AP ?
That’s a LOT of legal and financial muscle to go against, pretty risky, so probably not.

Now, What if …….

Someone posted anonymously on a small blog, or aggregate, that
sounded an awful lot like ( in the minds of the “interested” ) the
writer of the AP article ??
A small site like that could EASILY be bullied into turning over
the name ( if he had it, LOL but he doesn’t ), right …
After all, a small site does NOT have nearly the cash flow to
defend itself. So the “interested” manage to bully a smaller site
into giving it information that it could NEVER get from a large
press conglomerate. A slick way of getting around the protections
offered ( and affordable ) to Mainstream press anonymous sources.

VERY slick.

But, just a random thought.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:17:21 +0000

-= Disclaimer:This is just my opinion. =-
- As such I’m NOT suggesting any comment following –
- this preface is true. In fact I live in a fairy-tale –
- and nothing I say should be taken seriously. –

This IS an interesting post ….

“This can get everyone into trouble and sets up for add’s ”

LOL, reminds me of when the link first appeared, the troll
tried to keep poeple from looking by saying it had a virus.
I checked it my self after that , and of course, it was clean.
Now, as then, Bullshit.

“This can get everyone into trouble and sets up for add’s to the lawsuit- the plaintiff’s are going to go after everyone who posts libelelous statements. ”

There has been only 1 person, throughout the whole of this,
that has insisted that was anything libelous.
Our pet Troll.

“They will find out who the posters are. Its only a matter of time. Even sophisticated hackers using multiple proxies and remote locations eventually get caught. ”

This is clearly written by someone who knows less about the
internet than most 2 year olds.

I won’t post the link anymore, at Jon’s request, but ….

I didn’t put that file there.
I don’t know who did.
But I am certain it will not disappear, for a long time.
That link could be handy … if you have it don’t lose it.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:07:17 +0000

nice scare tactic.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 20:46:00 +0000

SLAPP doesn’t even exist in most US states . California is the primary and most the courts are throwing those out. Wrong path.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 20:43:08 +0000

Please everyone follow Jon’s advice. This can get everyone into trouble and sets up for add’s to the lawsuit- the plaintiff’s are going to go after everyone who posts libelelous statements. They will find out who the posters are. Its only a matter of time. Even sophisticated hackers using multiple proxies and remote locations eventually get caught.

SEE THE COMMENTS BELOW FROM JON NEWTON

Zips, etc By: Jon Newton 31 May, 2006 10:03

As I say at the end of this piece, “NOTE: For good reason, I decided to take the stories down when asked and I don’t approve of them being cached or zipped or otherwise kept available. I know the intentions were for the best, but if anyone’s preserved them or put them online, you’d be doing me a big favour by removing them. Thanks a lot, Jon”

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 03:04:28 +0000

yeh I understood what you meant. and all i meant was the troll is a Sharman shill. maybe if it had kept the posts down a litttle it would have kept on getting away with it but it got too clever

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 02:17:53 +0000

The most important thing to me is, I am sexier than the troll.

Luvie.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 01:49:32 +0000

You missed my point.
Nick has posted about some legal issues in a couple of other
threads, and signed them as … Nick

As I said,
Nick posts openly, and well, with sound reasoning.
I don’t agree with his conclusions, but he does an
excellent job of supporting his opinion.

That’s why Nick is DIFFERENT than the current troll

That was my point.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 01:44:19 +0000

This troll post is the same as, or along the lines of, of similar rants found elsewhere and has therefore been deleted.

NMFR means No More Free Rides

Cheers!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 01:31:22 +0000

they werent parker posts. thedy were sharman posts

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 01:01:10 +0000

I kinda like Nicks comments personally, he makes good comments.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 31 May 2006 19:03:23 +0000

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 31 May 2006 18:09:34 +0000

Anyone who wants to know the situation can …

Start here ..

http://s5.quicksharing.com/v/4797947/P2Pnetsuit.zip.html

I checked this link out.
It is a free file host site.
The zip file contains a PDF of the court papers, and
a text file with additional info … virus free

Next,
Find the line items.
They are NOT available on this site any more, but Google is
magic, is it not ?

-= This is a stock response to our pet troll =-
-= Since it repeats the same drivel =-
-= It deserves nothing more =-

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 31 May 2006 18:08:30 +0000

and the lie told more often is STILL not the truth

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 31 May 2006 18:05:55 +0000

Does anyone else see the coincidance of 1024?? Its a sign i tell you!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 31 May 2006 18:04:38 +0000

the troll didn’t even take my challange to comment on everything as a whole :/ instead all it can do it take one little thing and turn it into BS and hate towards one person.

TY to the mod or whomever for finally seeing the hate for what it was.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 31 May 2006 16:37:22 +0000

This troll post is the same as, or along the lines of, of similar rants found elsewhere and has therefore been deleted.

NMFR means No More Free Rides

Cheers!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 31 May 2006 16:36:36 +0000

This troll post is the same as, or along the lines of, of similar rants found elsewhere and has therefore been deleted.

NMFR means No More Free Rides

Cheers!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 31 May 2006 16:35:44 +0000

This troll post is the same as, or along the lines of, of similar rants found elsewhere and has therefore been deleted.

NMFR means No More Free Rides

Cheers!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 31 May 2006 16:34:52 +0000

This troll post is the same as, or along the lines of, of similar rants found elsewhere and has therefore been deleted.

NMFR means No More Free Rides

Cheers!