<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft anti-iPod team</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8943/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8943</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:54:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8943/comment-page-1#comment-45570</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-45570</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure if the Microsoft X-POD or whatever they call it catches on then within a year or two you&#039;ll be able to instal Linux on it - just like you can on the X-BOX and the iPod.  Then you&#039;ll be able to play .ogg and FLAC and shit on it.  (At least if it has a hard drive and it&#039;s not just a flash memory system...)

Anyway, I think Microsoft&#039;s main motive here (more than hardware sales) is to win the format war with Apple&#039;s AAC and have DRMed WMA become the defacto standard.  But with P2P getting bigger by the day, I antisipate that MP3 is here to stay for quite some time since it plays on everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure if the Microsoft X-POD or whatever they call it catches on then within a year or two you&#8217;ll be able to instal Linux on it &#8211; just like you can on the X-BOX and the iPod.  Then you&#8217;ll be able to play .ogg and FLAC and shit on it.  (At least if it has a hard drive and it&#8217;s not just a flash memory system&#8230;)</p>
<p>Anyway, I think Microsoft&#8217;s main motive here (more than hardware sales) is to win the format war with Apple&#8217;s AAC and have DRMed WMA become the defacto standard.  But with P2P getting bigger by the day, I antisipate that MP3 is here to stay for quite some time since it plays on everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8943/comment-page-1#comment-45195</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 21:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-45195</guid>
		<description>If your buying habits are heavily influenced by marketing, you ARE a fool.  Do your own research before buying anything.  

You need to look at commercials in a certain light.  Sure, it sounds great, but what is being left out?  It eats batteries?  The ink cartridges cost 50 bucks a piece?

Do your own research!  Be a RESPONSIBLE consumer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your buying habits are heavily influenced by marketing, you ARE a fool.  Do your own research before buying anything.  </p>
<p>You need to look at commercials in a certain light.  Sure, it sounds great, but what is being left out?  It eats batteries?  The ink cartridges cost 50 bucks a piece?</p>
<p>Do your own research!  Be a RESPONSIBLE consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8943/comment-page-1#comment-44696</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 00:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-44696</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t need no steenking DRM, m&#039;ok?

And you just know this is going to be riddled with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t need no steenking DRM, m&#8217;ok?</p>
<p>And you just know this is going to be riddled with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8943/comment-page-1#comment-44695</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 00:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-44695</guid>
		<description>If it:-
- Runs Rockbox
- Is easily upgradable and fixable. Like disks and easily replacable batteries
- Supports USB Mass Storage and USB host
- Has a decent size screen
- Is big enough to take a 60Gb 1.8&quot; disk or preferably a standard 2.5&quot; disk
Then yes please.

But if it&#039;s another pile of borked Creative firmware, tied to borked Microsoft software, then no thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it:-<br />
- Runs Rockbox<br />
- Is easily upgradable and fixable. Like disks and easily replacable batteries<br />
- Supports USB Mass Storage and USB host<br />
- Has a decent size screen<br />
- Is big enough to take a 60Gb 1.8&#8243; disk or preferably a standard 2.5&#8243; disk<br />
Then yes please.</p>
<p>But if it&#8217;s another pile of borked Creative firmware, tied to borked Microsoft software, then no thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8943/comment-page-1#comment-44659</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 22:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-44659</guid>
		<description>With Monopolysoft developing the software do you really expect the resulting product to support .ogg and .flac? 

Geez, you&#039;d think iTunes and iPod were magic or something. Sure, they are well designed products (for the most part...). THE thing, the ONLY thing that really sets them apart from their competitors (some of which are offering totally worthy products that are every bit as good as Apple&#039;s) is MARKETING. Once more for emphasis, M-A-R-K-E-T-I-N-G. If somebody wants to seriously challenge Apple in the portable market it will be done with marketing, advertising, and branding. A decent product wouldn&#039;t hurt either, but even a product that blew Apple away will not take over without very effective marketing.

P.S. If you think your buying habits are not heavily influenced by marketing you are a fool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Monopolysoft developing the software do you really expect the resulting product to support .ogg and .flac? </p>
<p>Geez, you&#8217;d think iTunes and iPod were magic or something. Sure, they are well designed products (for the most part&#8230;). THE thing, the ONLY thing that really sets them apart from their competitors (some of which are offering totally worthy products that are every bit as good as Apple&#8217;s) is MARKETING. Once more for emphasis, M-A-R-K-E-T-I-N-G. If somebody wants to seriously challenge Apple in the portable market it will be done with marketing, advertising, and branding. A decent product wouldn&#8217;t hurt either, but even a product that blew Apple away will not take over without very effective marketing.</p>
<p>P.S. If you think your buying habits are not heavily influenced by marketing you are a fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8943/comment-page-1#comment-44621</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 20:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-44621</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s cheaper than an IPod for the same storage, and it plays .ogg and .flac, count me in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s cheaper than an IPod for the same storage, and it plays .ogg and .flac, count me in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
