<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Yamanner email worm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9043/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9043</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:05:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9043/comment-page-1#comment-47177</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 00:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47177</guid>
		<description>http://p2pnet.net/story/9059</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://p2pnet.net/story/9059" rel="nofollow">http://p2pnet.net/story/9059</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9043/comment-page-1#comment-47176</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 00:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47176</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good that you have the &quot;Common sense&quot; not to open e-mails/attachments from those you do not know.

BUT, you are remiss in one detail here. This worm, known as &#039;yamanner&#039;, is contained WITHIN the BODY of the e-mail with &quot;New Graphic Site&quot; as its Subject. This enables the worm to attack WHEN the e-mail is OPENED!!!

One of the links contained within this article said that Yahoo NOW has it under control, but as an added precaution to add &quot; av3(at)yahoo.com &quot; to your Blocked List.

Actually READING articles ALL the way through ...ALONG WITH ALL their LINKS... is TRUE &quot;Common sense&quot;!!! :&#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good that you have the &#8220;Common sense&#8221; not to open e-mails/attachments from those you do not know.</p>
<p>BUT, you are remiss in one detail here. This worm, known as &#8216;yamanner&#8217;, is contained WITHIN the BODY of the e-mail with &#8220;New Graphic Site&#8221; as its Subject. This enables the worm to attack WHEN the e-mail is OPENED!!!</p>
<p>One of the links contained within this article said that Yahoo NOW has it under control, but as an added precaution to add &#8221; av3(at)yahoo.com &#8221; to your Blocked List.</p>
<p>Actually READING articles ALL the way through &#8230;ALONG WITH ALL their LINKS&#8230; is TRUE &#8220;Common sense&#8221;!!! <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':|' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9043/comment-page-1#comment-46959</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 01:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-46959</guid>
		<description>I never, ever, open email from anyone I don&#039;t know. Doing such ensures I will never see an attachment from the majority of emailers, be they legit or spam. 

Since many malwares use the victims&#039; email addresses in store, those I know that sent me email, will have to tell me to expect an attachment before sending it or it is deleted anyway, unopened. It&#039;s my email account not someone elses, I will use it as I see fit, not as someone else expects me to. Sending psycological ploys to tempt me doesn&#039;t work either as I stand steadfast by those above rules. I guess this is for those like me who believe our email accounts are ours.

The above won&#039;t work for me either, as I use no Instant Messaging services. For the most, they are so full of spammers and malware oppurtunity seekers that it isn&#039;t worth the time to put them all on block lists, only to have to do it again the next day when they have changed their name/data/ect. 

However the method here is what is of interest to me. Meaning that sometime in the future, this prehaps won&#039;t be enough to do to protect yourself from unwanted intrusions. At present, it requires some action on your part to initiate the malware. Opening an attachment, clicking on a link, or some how doing something so that the malware is allowed into the system. I await the day of the selfactivating malware because it has &quot;showed up&quot; in your inbox without any need of doing anything. 

Spammers and spyware have for the most part guided the malware writers in how to invade systems. Going from having to download a program to activate it, to now just showing up on a website to catch an infection. There are far more reasons to fight spammers and spyware than is seen on the surface. Certainly, I will never, ever, buy from a spammer. I hate such and refuse to reward them with a responce of any nature. I would rather they waste their efforts with no return answer of any nature. The same with the companies that end up on the spammers list of wares; why reward them for obnoxious behavior?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never, ever, open email from anyone I don&#8217;t know. Doing such ensures I will never see an attachment from the majority of emailers, be they legit or spam. </p>
<p>Since many malwares use the victims&#8217; email addresses in store, those I know that sent me email, will have to tell me to expect an attachment before sending it or it is deleted anyway, unopened. It&#8217;s my email account not someone elses, I will use it as I see fit, not as someone else expects me to. Sending psycological ploys to tempt me doesn&#8217;t work either as I stand steadfast by those above rules. I guess this is for those like me who believe our email accounts are ours.</p>
<p>The above won&#8217;t work for me either, as I use no Instant Messaging services. For the most, they are so full of spammers and malware oppurtunity seekers that it isn&#8217;t worth the time to put them all on block lists, only to have to do it again the next day when they have changed their name/data/ect. </p>
<p>However the method here is what is of interest to me. Meaning that sometime in the future, this prehaps won&#8217;t be enough to do to protect yourself from unwanted intrusions. At present, it requires some action on your part to initiate the malware. Opening an attachment, clicking on a link, or some how doing something so that the malware is allowed into the system. I await the day of the selfactivating malware because it has &#8220;showed up&#8221; in your inbox without any need of doing anything. </p>
<p>Spammers and spyware have for the most part guided the malware writers in how to invade systems. Going from having to download a program to activate it, to now just showing up on a website to catch an infection. There are far more reasons to fight spammers and spyware than is seen on the surface. Certainly, I will never, ever, buy from a spammer. I hate such and refuse to reward them with a responce of any nature. I would rather they waste their efforts with no return answer of any nature. The same with the companies that end up on the spammers list of wares; why reward them for obnoxious behavior?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9043/comment-page-1#comment-46927</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-46927</guid>
		<description>does this only infect your computer if you open it with internet explorer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does this only infect your computer if you open it with internet explorer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
