<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s secret Project 02</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9063/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9063</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:23:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9063/comment-page-1#comment-129417</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 05:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-129417</guid>
		<description>I helped build one of these buildings in the Dalles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I helped build one of these buildings in the Dalles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9063/comment-page-1#comment-47238</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47238</guid>
		<description>Since when did local Government officials get the authority to enter into, or be bound by &#039;confidentiality agreements&#039; with corporate, for-profit entities?  Does this give them the privilege of refusing to answer questions posed by elected municipality officials at open meetings?  If so, this is total BS, and probably a violation of the state or local &quot;sunshine&quot; laws, which prohibits the closure of virtually all meetings of government bodies, except in very limited, specific circumstances, such as to discuss personnel issues concerning specific, identifiable individuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when did local Government officials get the authority to enter into, or be bound by &#8216;confidentiality agreements&#8217; with corporate, for-profit entities?  Does this give them the privilege of refusing to answer questions posed by elected municipality officials at open meetings?  If so, this is total BS, and probably a violation of the state or local &#8220;sunshine&#8221; laws, which prohibits the closure of virtually all meetings of government bodies, except in very limited, specific circumstances, such as to discuss personnel issues concerning specific, identifiable individuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
