<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Captain Copyright for kids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9074/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9074</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9074/comment-page-1#comment-48140</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 20:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-48140</guid>
		<description>The other issue, which the cartels absolutely do NOT wanted tested in court, is whether or not the statutory damages specified in Title 17 USC (Federal Copyright Laws) violates the &quot;excessive fines&quot; clause of the 8th Amendment to the US Constitution.  Normally the clause applies only to bar the Government from levying excessive fines (i.e., a $500,000.00 fine for littering,) but it also has applicability in a civil proceeding where parameters for damage awards are specified by staute.  In this case, although the money is awarded to the copyright holder as &#039;damages&#039;, it&#039;s intent is as a deterrent, as would be a fine.  The copyright holder need not present evidence as to actual damages but must provide argument to justify what they&#039;ve requested as such deterrent &#039;damages&#039; in an infringement case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other issue, which the cartels absolutely do NOT wanted tested in court, is whether or not the statutory damages specified in Title 17 USC (Federal Copyright Laws) violates the &#8220;excessive fines&#8221; clause of the 8th Amendment to the US Constitution.  Normally the clause applies only to bar the Government from levying excessive fines (i.e., a $500,000.00 fine for littering,) but it also has applicability in a civil proceeding where parameters for damage awards are specified by staute.  In this case, although the money is awarded to the copyright holder as &#8216;damages&#8217;, it&#8217;s intent is as a deterrent, as would be a fine.  The copyright holder need not present evidence as to actual damages but must provide argument to justify what they&#8217;ve requested as such deterrent &#8216;damages&#8217; in an infringement case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9074/comment-page-1#comment-47902</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 23:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47902</guid>
		<description>Gee, the main accent colors of the Captain&#039;s outfit are Green and Gold, so we know what he is all about.  If fact, I wonder who the genius was to come up with that incredibly cynical idea for his outfit.  I would think if they wanted something that appealed to children they would have come up with something more accessible they could relate to rather than a smarmy, squared-jawed, superhero clichÃ© that more resembles something of an updated version of a steroid-abusing caricature of Dudley &#039;Dianabol&#039; Do-Right who looks like he&#039;s about to scold everyone to eat their vegetables (and supplements).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, the main accent colors of the Captain&#8217;s outfit are Green and Gold, so we know what he is all about.  If fact, I wonder who the genius was to come up with that incredibly cynical idea for his outfit.  I would think if they wanted something that appealed to children they would have come up with something more accessible they could relate to rather than a smarmy, squared-jawed, superhero clichÃ© that more resembles something of an updated version of a steroid-abusing caricature of Dudley &#8216;Dianabol&#8217; Do-Right who looks like he&#8217;s about to scold everyone to eat their vegetables (and supplements).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


