<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox tops &#8216;critical&#8217; list</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9135/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9135</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9135/comment-page-1#comment-50796</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50796</guid>
		<description>I used to run spybot all the time when I used IE, since changing over to FF it hasn&#039;t picked up anything other than the odd suspect cookie (easily removed and pretty harmless anyway).

I haven&#039;t had any viruses or security breaches in 5 years and I run an antivirus software free XP install. Education is the key, know what you&#039;re clicking on (don&#039;t hide known file extensions), avoid IE/Outlook (85% of the web/mail client market, more than 85% of viruses written for them). Sure FireFox ain&#039;t perfect, it&#039;ll bleed if you kick it but in my experience IE goes totaly belly up if you hand it some valid html!?!

I also protect myself with sods/murphies law. If you keep everything backed up you&#039;ll never have any virus/spyware/hardware failure problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to run spybot all the time when I used IE, since changing over to FF it hasn&#8217;t picked up anything other than the odd suspect cookie (easily removed and pretty harmless anyway).</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t had any viruses or security breaches in 5 years and I run an antivirus software free XP install. Education is the key, know what you&#8217;re clicking on (don&#8217;t hide known file extensions), avoid IE/Outlook (85% of the web/mail client market, more than 85% of viruses written for them). Sure FireFox ain&#8217;t perfect, it&#8217;ll bleed if you kick it but in my experience IE goes totaly belly up if you hand it some valid html!?!</p>
<p>I also protect myself with sods/murphies law. If you keep everything backed up you&#8217;ll never have any virus/spyware/hardware failure problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9135/comment-page-1#comment-50683</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 05:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50683</guid>
		<description>I must agree with the above Reader/Writer â I have had no problems since switching from IE6 to Firefox, which does, indeed, keep me updated. I once thought IE6 was the greatest thing since sliced bread, and I attributed most of my Malware to other sources; but as soon as I dumped IE6 for Firefox, my malware problems miraculously vanished. (of course, a good desktop utilities program, such as System Suite Professional 6 helps to keep things humming along. I get no royalties or kickbacks from them, but Iâll gladly recommend them any time!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must agree with the above Reader/Writer â I have had no problems since switching from IE6 to Firefox, which does, indeed, keep me updated. I once thought IE6 was the greatest thing since sliced bread, and I attributed most of my Malware to other sources; but as soon as I dumped IE6 for Firefox, my malware problems miraculously vanished. (of course, a good desktop utilities program, such as System Suite Professional 6 helps to keep things humming along. I get no royalties or kickbacks from them, but Iâll gladly recommend them any time!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9135/comment-page-1#comment-50596</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 23:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50596</guid>
		<description>On June 20th, Cambridge, Massachusetts-based software security company Bit9 issued a report announcing what it found to be the top 15 applications with known vulnerabilities. While BitDefender 9 was listed among these vulnerabilities, BitDefender has received today a written apology from Bit9âs executives for including these products. 

While BitDefender 9 did include a minor vulnerability last September, BitDefender immediately discovered the problem and issued an automatic patch which required no user intervention.

âBy erroneously including BitDefender 9 among its list of top vulnerabilities, Bit9 has caused great confusion in the IT market and a disservice to our emerging consumer base,â commented Bogdan Dumitru, BitDefenderâs chief technology officer. âIt is very common for software companies â at some point or another â to find vulnerabilities in their new software releases. As one of the worldâs most powerful antivirus software and data security solutions, BitDefender prides itself on ensuring that these vulnerabilities are found and fixed as quickly as possible. In this case, we did just that. It was wrong and slanderous for Bit9 to have issued this weekâs statement without first confirming the facts.â 

Today, BitDefender is trusted by over 41 million users worldwide and offers the industryâs most efficient line of anti-virus and data security defense. The company is a recipient of countless awards for its flawless protection of both enterprise and personal computer use software. BitDefender represents the new drivers in the perimeter security market â challenging established vendors which force users to accept less effective and often more costly security applications.

For further information, please contact: BitDefender@topazpartners.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On June 20th, Cambridge, Massachusetts-based software security company Bit9 issued a report announcing what it found to be the top 15 applications with known vulnerabilities. While BitDefender 9 was listed among these vulnerabilities, BitDefender has received today a written apology from Bit9âs executives for including these products. </p>
<p>While BitDefender 9 did include a minor vulnerability last September, BitDefender immediately discovered the problem and issued an automatic patch which required no user intervention.</p>
<p>âBy erroneously including BitDefender 9 among its list of top vulnerabilities, Bit9 has caused great confusion in the IT market and a disservice to our emerging consumer base,â commented Bogdan Dumitru, BitDefenderâs chief technology officer. âIt is very common for software companies â at some point or another â to find vulnerabilities in their new software releases. As one of the worldâs most powerful antivirus software and data security solutions, BitDefender prides itself on ensuring that these vulnerabilities are found and fixed as quickly as possible. In this case, we did just that. It was wrong and slanderous for Bit9 to have issued this weekâs statement without first confirming the facts.â </p>
<p>Today, BitDefender is trusted by over 41 million users worldwide and offers the industryâs most efficient line of anti-virus and data security defense. The company is a recipient of countless awards for its flawless protection of both enterprise and personal computer use software. BitDefender represents the new drivers in the perimeter security market â challenging established vendors which force users to accept less effective and often more costly security applications.</p>
<p>For further information, please contact: <a href="mailto:BitDefender@topazpartners.com">BitDefender@topazpartners.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9135/comment-page-1#comment-50589</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50589</guid>
		<description>&quot;It relies on the end user, rather than a central administrator, to manually patch or upgrade the software to eliminate the vulnerability, if such a patch exists.&quot;

I&#039;m sorry, Firefox does not fall under this category. The patches are automatically downloaded. Whereas, Opera and IE are not. Get your record straight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It relies on the end user, rather than a central administrator, to manually patch or upgrade the software to eliminate the vulnerability, if such a patch exists.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, Firefox does not fall under this category. The patches are automatically downloaded. Whereas, Opera and IE are not. Get your record straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9135/comment-page-1#comment-50576</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50576</guid>
		<description>Of course, IE is not on the list.  Pick on the old version of a competing browser; just leave MS alone...

I openly question the list of &#039;bad&#039; apps.  I use Firefox under IT&#039;s nose because of the risks in IE.  If I am caught, I would lose my work terminal.  So much for safe IT practices...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, IE is not on the list.  Pick on the old version of a competing browser; just leave MS alone&#8230;</p>
<p>I openly question the list of &#8216;bad&#8217; apps.  I use Firefox under IT&#8217;s nose because of the risks in IE.  If I am caught, I would lose my work terminal.  So much for safe IT practices&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9135/comment-page-1#comment-50557</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 20:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50557</guid>
		<description>So the top ten are basically all the programs that people who aren&#039;t that hot on computer security have installed and use every day. Lovely. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the top ten are basically all the programs that people who aren&#8217;t that hot on computer security have installed and use every day. Lovely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


